METU vs. XTAP
METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) and XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METU returned -30.67% vs 21.00% for XTAP. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METU charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTAP.
Performance
METU vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METU achieves a -20.23% return, which is significantly lower than XTAP's 10.96% return.
METU
- 1D
- 8.31%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- -20.23%
- 6M
- -15.96%
- 1Y
- -30.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTAP
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- —
METU vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | -20.23% | -1.01% | 25.56% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 10.96% | 17.58% | 8.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between METU and XTAP is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between METU and XTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
METU vs. XTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
METU
XTAP
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
METU
XTAP
Basic Materials
METU
-
XTAP
Consumer Cyclical
METU
-
XTAP
Consumer Defensive
METU
-
XTAP
Energy
METU
-
XTAP
Financial Services
METU
-
XTAP
Healthcare
METU
-
XTAP
Industrials
METU
-
XTAP
Real Estate
METU
-
XTAP
Technology
METU
-
XTAP
Utilities
METU
-
XTAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METU vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank
METU
XTAP
METU vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | 4.50 | -4.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | 7.78 | -8.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 2.22 | -1.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 14.82 | -15.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 78.70 | -79.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 4.50 | -4.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.80 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
METU vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -61.85%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and XTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.85% | -22.13% | -39.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.52% | -1.42% | -60.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.01% | -0.21% | -48.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -3.45% | -20.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.23% | 0.27% | +32.96% |
Volatility
METU vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a higher volatility of 17.56% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 1.10%. This indicates that METU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.56% | 1.10% | +16.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.29% | 3.16% | +50.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.38% | 4.70% | +65.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.35% | 14.54% | +57.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.35% | 14.41% | +57.94% |
METU vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
METU vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison
METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, while XTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | 3.87% | 3.00% | 1.40% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METU and XTAP have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METU has higher volatility (17.56%) compared to XTAP (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METU dropped -61.85% vs XTAP's -22.13%.
On 1-year performance, XTAP leads with 21.00% vs -30.67% for METU. On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XTAP has performed better with a 21.00% return vs -30.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for METU.
METU has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 0.00% for XTAP.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for METU and 0.79% for XTAP.
XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.50 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METU and XTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer