METU vs. SSO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both Leveraged Equities funds. METU is actively managed, while SSO is passively managed. Over the past year, METU returned -46.99% vs 43.79% for SSO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METU charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.

Performance

METU vs. SSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METU achieves a -34.42% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 15.08% return.

METU

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -17.10%
• YTD: -34.42%
• 6M: -31.54%
• 1Y: -46.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SSO

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: 15.08%
• 6M: 15.47%
• 1Y: 43.79%
• 3Y*: 34.18%
• 5Y*: 18.57%
• 10Y*: 24.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METU vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	-34.42%	-1.01%	28.79%
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500	15.08%	26.19%	19.51%

Correlation

The correlation between METU and SSO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024	0.57

The correlation between METU and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

METU vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	METU	SSO
Communication Services	100.0%	11.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.9%
Energy	-	3.5%
Financial Services	-	11.8%
Healthcare	-	8.5%
Industrials	-	8.3%
Real Estate	-	1.9%
Technology	-	35.6%
Utilities	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

METU vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METU

METU Risk / Return Rank: 4
METU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
METU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
METU Omega Ratio Rank: 4
METU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
METU Martin Ratio Rank: 2

SSO

SSO Risk / Return Rank: 59
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METU vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METU	SSO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.66	1.79	-2.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.76	2.33	-3.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.31	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	2.42	-3.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	10.37	-11.73

METU vs. SSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METU Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the SSO Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METU and SSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

METU vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -61.85%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and SSO.

Drawdown Indicators

	METU	SSO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.85%	-84.67%	+22.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.52%	-18.17%	-43.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.21%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-46.73%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.08%	-4.94%	-53.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.93%	-19.55%	-4.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.46%	4.24%	+30.22%

Volatility

METU vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a higher volatility of 20.46% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 8.74%. This indicates that METU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METU	SSO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.46%	8.74%	+11.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.04%	19.17%	+34.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.96%	24.54%	+46.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.35%	33.78%	+38.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.35%	35.95%	+36.40%

METU vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

METU vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison

METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than SSO's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	4.71%	3.00%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500	0.64%	0.68%	0.85%	0.18%	0.50%	0.18%	0.20%	0.50%	0.75%	0.39%	0.51%	0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METU and SSO in my portfolio?

METU and SSO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METU or SSO?

METU has higher volatility (20.46%) compared to SSO (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METU dropped -61.85% vs SSO's -84.67%.

Which ETF is better, METU or SSO?

On 1-year performance, SSO leads with 43.79% vs -46.99% for METU. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 8.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METU or SSO?

Over the 1-year period, SSO has performed better with a 43.79% return vs -46.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METU or SSO?

SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for METU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METU or SSO?

METU has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 0.64% for SSO.

What is the main difference between METU and SSO?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for METU and 0.87% for SSO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.