PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METU vs. SPXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METU vs. SPXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METU achieves a -36.42% return, which is significantly lower than SPXS's -20.76% return.


METU

1D
-1.32%
1M
-17.64%
YTD
-36.42%
6M
-37.57%
1Y
-49.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPXS

1D
3.42%
1M
3.11%
YTD
-20.76%
6M
-18.37%
1Y
-44.21%
3Y*
-40.67%
5Y*
-33.53%
10Y*
-42.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METU vs. SPXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
METU
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
-36.42%-1.01%28.79%
SPXS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares
-20.76%-41.53%-24.97%

Correlation

The correlation between METU and SPXS is -0.56, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024

-0.58

The correlation between METU and SPXS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.58 to -0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METU vs. SPXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METU
METU Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
METU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METU Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
METU Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
METU Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
METU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXS
SPXS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SPXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METU vs. SPXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


METUSPXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.79

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

-0.94

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

-1.63

+0.25

METU vs. SPXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METU Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is higher than the SPXS Sharpe Ratio of -1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METU and SPXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

METU vs. SPXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -61.85%, smaller than the maximum SPXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and SPXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METUSPXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.85%

-100.00%

+38.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.52%

-46.94%

-14.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.36%

-100.00%

+40.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.32%

-96.29%

+71.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.54%

29.25%

+6.29%

Volatility

METU vs. SPXS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a higher volatility of 25.96% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS) at 14.08%. This indicates that METU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METUSPXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.96%

14.08%

+11.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.94%

29.38%

+26.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.28%

37.37%

+34.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.77%

50.68%

+22.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.77%

53.59%

+19.18%

METU vs. SPXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXS's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

METU vs. SPXS - Dividend Comparison

METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than SPXS's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
METU
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
4.86%3.00%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPXS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares
4.62%4.93%6.18%5.66%0.00%0.00%0.51%1.74%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


METU and SPXS have a correlation of -0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

METU has higher volatility (25.96%) compared to SPXS (14.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METU dropped -61.85% vs SPXS's -100.00%.

On 1-year performance, SPXS leads with -44.21% vs -49.17% for METU. On fees, METU is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, SPXS has been the lower-risk option at 14.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPXS has performed better with a -44.21% return vs -49.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

METU is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SPXS.

METU has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 4.62% for SPXS.

METU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPXS is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for METU and 1.08% for SPXS.

METU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.68 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METU and SPXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer