PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METU vs. SPXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METU vs. SPXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METU achieves a -20.23% return, which is significantly higher than SPXS's -25.49% return.


METU

1D
8.31%
1M
2.33%
YTD
-20.23%
6M
-15.96%
1Y
-30.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPXS

1D
2.19%
1M
-13.11%
YTD
-25.49%
6M
-24.86%
1Y
-48.73%
3Y*
-42.68%
5Y*
-34.76%
10Y*
-42.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METU vs. SPXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
METU
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
-20.23%-1.01%25.56%
SPXS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares
-25.49%-41.53%-22.38%

Correlation

The correlation between METU and SPXS is -0.56, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024

-0.57

The correlation between METU and SPXS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.57 to -0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METU vs. SPXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METU
METU Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
METU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METU Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
METU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
METU Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
METU Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXS
SPXS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SPXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METU vs. SPXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


METUSPXSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.44

-1.38

+0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.24

-2.31

+2.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.75

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

-0.96

+0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.92

-1.62

+0.70

METU vs. SPXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METU Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is higher than the SPXS Sharpe Ratio of -1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METU and SPXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METUSPXSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

-1.38

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

-0.83

+0.83

Drawdowns

METU vs. SPXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -61.85%, smaller than the maximum SPXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and SPXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METUSPXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.85%

-100.00%

+38.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.52%

-50.77%

-10.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.01%

-100.00%

+50.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.55%

-96.30%

+72.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.23%

30.04%

+3.19%

Volatility

METU vs. SPXS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a higher volatility of 17.56% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS) at 8.51%. This indicates that METU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METUSPXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.56%

8.51%

+9.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.29%

26.82%

+26.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.38%

35.54%

+34.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.35%

50.39%

+21.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.35%

53.54%

+18.81%

METU vs. SPXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXS's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

METU vs. SPXS - Dividend Comparison

METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than SPXS's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
METU
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
3.87%3.00%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPXS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares
4.91%4.93%6.18%5.66%0.00%0.00%0.51%1.74%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


METU and SPXS have a correlation of -0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

METU has higher volatility (17.56%) compared to SPXS (8.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METU dropped -61.85% vs SPXS's -100.00%.

On 1-year performance, METU leads with -30.67% vs -48.73% for SPXS. On fees, METU is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, SPXS has been the lower-risk option at 8.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, METU has performed better with a -30.67% return vs -48.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

METU is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SPXS.

SPXS has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 3.87% for METU.

METU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPXS is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for METU and 1.08% for SPXS.

METU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METU and SPXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer