METU vs. SPXS
METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) and SPXS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - METU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while SPXS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%). METU is actively managed, while SPXS is passively managed. Over the past year, METU returned -30.67% vs -48.73% for SPXS. At a correlation of -0.57, they often move in opposite directions. METU charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SPXS.
Performance
METU vs. SPXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METU achieves a -20.23% return, which is significantly higher than SPXS's -25.49% return.
METU
- 1D
- 8.31%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- -20.23%
- 6M
- -15.96%
- 1Y
- -30.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXS
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- -13.11%
- YTD
- -25.49%
- 6M
- -24.86%
- 1Y
- -48.73%
- 3Y*
- -42.68%
- 5Y*
- -34.76%
- 10Y*
- -42.01%
METU vs. SPXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | -20.23% | -1.01% | 25.56% |
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | -25.49% | -41.53% | -22.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between METU and SPXS is -0.56, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | -0.57 |
The correlation between METU and SPXS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.57 to -0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METU vs. SPXS — Risk / Return Rank
METU
SPXS
METU vs. SPXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | -1.38 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | -2.31 | +2.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.75 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | -0.96 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | -1.62 | +0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | -1.38 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | -0.83 | +0.83 |
Drawdowns
METU vs. SPXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -61.85%, smaller than the maximum SPXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and SPXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.85% | -100.00% | +38.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.52% | -50.77% | -10.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.01% | -100.00% | +50.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -96.30% | +72.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.23% | 30.04% | +3.19% |
Volatility
METU vs. SPXS - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a higher volatility of 17.56% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS) at 8.51%. This indicates that METU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.56% | 8.51% | +9.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.29% | 26.82% | +26.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.38% | 35.54% | +34.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.35% | 50.39% | +21.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.35% | 53.54% | +18.81% |
METU vs. SPXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
METU vs. SPXS - Dividend Comparison
METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than SPXS's 4.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | 3.87% | 3.00% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | 4.91% | 4.93% | 6.18% | 5.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 1.74% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METU and SPXS have a correlation of -0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METU has higher volatility (17.56%) compared to SPXS (8.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METU dropped -61.85% vs SPXS's -100.00%.
On 1-year performance, METU leads with -30.67% vs -48.73% for SPXS. On fees, METU is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, SPXS has been the lower-risk option at 8.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, METU has performed better with a -30.67% return vs -48.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
METU is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SPXS.
SPXS has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 3.87% for METU.
METU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPXS is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for METU and 1.08% for SPXS.
METU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METU and SPXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer