PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METU vs. SPXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METU vs. SPXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METU achieves a -14.71% return, which is significantly higher than SPXS's -24.50% return.


METU

1D
-3.71%
1M
30.05%
6M
-9.56%
YTD
-14.71%
1Y
-34.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPXS

1D
2.30%
1M
-3.30%
6M
-20.30%
YTD
-24.50%
1Y
-40.89%
3Y*
-39.60%
5Y*
-33.12%
10Y*
-41.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METU vs. SPXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
METU
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
-14.71%-1.01%28.79%
SPXS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares
-24.50%-41.53%-24.97%

Correlation

The correlation between METU and SPXS is -0.54, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024

-0.57

The correlation between METU and SPXS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.57 to -0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METU vs. SPXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METU
METU Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
METU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METU Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
METU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
METU Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
METU Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXS
SPXS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SPXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXS Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METU vs. SPXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


METUSPXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.82

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

-0.94

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.93

-1.64

+0.71

METU vs. SPXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METU Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is higher than the SPXS Sharpe Ratio of -1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METU and SPXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

METU vs. SPXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, smaller than the maximum SPXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and SPXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METUSPXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.86%

-100.00%

+38.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.54%

-43.64%

-17.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.48%

-100.00%

+54.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.06%

-96.30%

+71.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.56%

24.98%

+12.58%

Volatility

METU vs. SPXS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a higher volatility of 31.56% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS) at 12.80%. This indicates that METU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METUSPXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.56%

12.80%

+18.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.87%

30.04%

+31.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.94%

37.71%

+39.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.41%

50.75%

+23.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.41%

53.52%

+20.89%

METU vs. SPXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXS's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

METU vs. SPXS - Dividend Comparison

METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than SPXS's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
METU
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
3.25%3.00%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPXS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares
4.50%4.93%6.18%5.66%0.00%0.00%0.51%1.74%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


METU and SPXS have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

METU has higher volatility (31.56%) compared to SPXS (12.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METU dropped -61.86% vs SPXS's -100.00%.

On 1-year performance, METU leads with -34.95% vs -40.89% for SPXS. On fees, METU is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, SPXS has been the lower-risk option at 12.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, METU has performed better with a -34.95% return vs -40.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

METU is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SPXS.

SPXS has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 3.25% for METU.

METU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPXS is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for METU and 1.08% for SPXS.

METU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.46 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METU and SPXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer