METU vs. AAPU
METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) and AAPU (Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. METU is actively managed, while AAPU is passively managed. Over the past year, METU returned -44.10% vs 91.47% for AAPU. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METU charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for AAPU.
Performance
METU vs. AAPU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METU achieves a -29.87% return, which is significantly lower than AAPU's 16.06% return.
METU
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -9.48%
- YTD
- -29.87%
- 6M
- -31.83%
- 1Y
- -44.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPU
- 1D
- -3.73%
- 1M
- 5.13%
- YTD
- 16.06%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 91.47%
- 3Y*
- 23.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METU vs. AAPU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | -29.87% | -1.01% | 28.79% |
AAPU Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares | 16.06% | -2.91% | 52.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between METU and AAPU is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024 | 0.30 |
METU vs. AAPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
METU
AAPU
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
METU
AAPU
-
Basic Materials
METU
-
AAPU
-
Consumer Cyclical
METU
-
AAPU
-
Consumer Defensive
METU
-
AAPU
-
Energy
METU
-
AAPU
-
Financial Services
METU
-
AAPU
-
Healthcare
METU
-
AAPU
-
Industrials
METU
-
AAPU
-
Real Estate
METU
-
AAPU
-
Technology
METU
-
AAPU
Utilities
METU
-
AAPU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METU vs. AAPU — Risk / Return Rank
METU
AAPU
METU vs. AAPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares (AAPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METU | AAPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.34 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 3.18 | -3.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 7.67 | -8.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METU | AAPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | 2.06 | -2.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.42 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
METU vs. AAPU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -61.85%, which is greater than AAPU's maximum drawdown of -58.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and AAPU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METU | AAPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.85% | -58.61% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.52% | -28.90% | -32.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.17% | -8.63% | -46.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.72% | -17.65% | -6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.71% | 11.99% | +21.72% |
Volatility
METU vs. AAPU - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a higher volatility of 21.06% compared to Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares (AAPU) at 11.17%. This indicates that METU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METU | AAPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.06% | 11.17% | +9.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.10% | 31.94% | +22.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.03% | 44.83% | +26.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.60% | 48.91% | +23.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.60% | 48.91% | +23.69% |
METU vs. AAPU - Expense Ratio Comparison
METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than AAPU's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
METU vs. AAPU - Dividend Comparison
METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than AAPU's 7.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPU Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares | 7.32% | 8.66% | 14.58% | 2.32% | 0.79% |
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | 4.40% | 3.00% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METU and AAPU have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METU has higher volatility (21.06%) compared to AAPU (11.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METU dropped -61.85% vs AAPU's -58.61%.
On 1-year performance, AAPU leads with 91.47% vs -44.10% for METU. On fees, AAPU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, AAPU has been the lower-risk option at 11.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPU has performed better with a 91.47% return vs -44.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAPU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for METU.
AAPU has the higher dividend yield at 7.32%, compared with 4.40% for METU.
Their fees differ too: 1.07% for METU and 1.04% for AAPU.
AAPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METU and AAPU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer