METL vs. XLK
METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Sprott, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. METL is actively managed, while XLK is passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
METL vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 28.09% return.
METL
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 6M
- 15.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 28.09%
- 6M
- 25.10%
- 1Y
- 55.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.33%
- 5Y*
- 22.26%
- 10Y*
- 25.04%
METL vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 7.51% | 27.04% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.09% | 6.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between METL and XLK is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METL vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
METL
XLK
METL vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METL | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.41 | +0.77 |
Drawdowns
METL vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METL | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.39% | -82.05% | +54.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.48% | -7.08% | -11.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -34.95% | +26.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.80% | — |
Volatility
METL vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METL | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.85% | 22.08% | +22.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.85% | 25.10% | +19.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.85% | 24.60% | +20.25% |
METL vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
METL vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than XLK's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.92% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METL and XLK have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
METL has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.41% for XLK.
METL is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for METL and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for METL and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer