METL vs. URAN
METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) and URAN (Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds. METL is actively managed, while URAN is passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for URAN.
Performance
METL vs. URAN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a 18.34% return, which is significantly higher than URAN's 5.17% return.
METL
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 18.34%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URAN
- 1D
- -3.96%
- 1M
- -5.96%
- YTD
- 5.17%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 28.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METL vs. URAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 18.34% | 27.04% |
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF | 5.17% | 6.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between METL and URAN is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METL vs. URAN — Risk / Return Rank
METL
URAN
METL vs. URAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METL | URAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.72 | 0.87 | +0.85 |
Drawdowns
METL vs. URAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, smaller than the maximum URAN drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and URAN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METL | URAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.39% | -31.96% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.27% | -20.16% | +9.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -10.75% | +2.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.71% | — |
Volatility
METL vs. URAN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METL | URAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.94% | 39.47% | +4.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.94% | 39.13% | +4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.94% | 39.13% | +4.81% |
METL vs. URAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than URAN's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
METL vs. URAN - Dividend Comparison
METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than URAN's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.84% | 0.99% | 0.00% |
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF | 2.44% | 2.56% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METL and URAN have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, URAN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
URAN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
URAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 0.84% for METL.
They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for METL and 0.35% for URAN.
Find the right allocation for METL and URAN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer