METL vs. GUNR
METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) and GUNR (FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds. METL is actively managed, while GUNR is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for GUNR.
Performance
METL vs. GUNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with METL having a 18.34% return and GUNR slightly higher at 19.20%.
METL
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 18.34%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUNR
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 19.20%
- 6M
- 21.67%
- 1Y
- 41.45%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 9.93%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
METL vs. GUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 18.34% | 27.04% |
GUNR FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund | 19.20% | 7.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between METL and GUNR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METL vs. GUNR — Risk / Return Rank
METL
GUNR
METL vs. GUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METL | GUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.72 | 0.33 | +1.39 |
Drawdowns
METL vs. GUNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, smaller than the maximum GUNR drawdown of -45.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and GUNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METL | GUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.39% | -45.64% | +18.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.27% | -2.56% | -7.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -10.40% | +2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.79% | — |
Volatility
METL vs. GUNR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METL | GUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.94% | 15.14% | +28.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.94% | 18.98% | +24.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.94% | 20.42% | +23.52% |
METL vs. GUNR - Expense Ratio Comparison
METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GUNR's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
METL vs. GUNR - Dividend Comparison
METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than GUNR's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUNR FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund | 2.24% | 2.81% | 3.39% | 3.55% | 4.12% | 3.61% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 3.27% | 2.00% | 1.73% | 4.50% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.84% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METL and GUNR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GUNR is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GUNR is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
GUNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.84% for METL.
They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for METL and 0.46% for GUNR.
Find the right allocation for METL and GUNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer