PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMH3.L vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMH3.L vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMH3.L vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SMH3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities
12.49%74.67%66.99%261.41%-85.13%4.53%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
-9.39%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%0.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH3.L achieves a 12.49% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's -9.39% return.


SMH3.L

1D
18.04%
1M
-10.93%
YTD
12.49%
6M
34.61%
1Y
269.12%
3Y*
82.15%
5Y*
10Y*

VUG

1D
1.09%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
-9.39%
6M
-8.17%
1Y
18.52%
3Y*
21.59%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
16.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMH3.L vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SMH3.L vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH3.L
SMH3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH3.L vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMH3.LVUGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.75

0.82

+1.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.78

1.32

+1.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.19

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.66

1.19

+5.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.41

4.15

+17.26

SMH3.L vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH3.L and VUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMH3.LVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

0.82

+1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.57

-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between SMH3.L and VUG is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SMH3.L vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

SMH3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMH3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.45%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Drawdowns

SMH3.L vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH3.L drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH3.L and VUG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMH3.LVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.37%

-50.68%

-38.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.09%

-16.53%

-26.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.85%

-12.25%

-12.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-7.13%

-42.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.21%

4.72%

+7.49%

Volatility

SMH3.L vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) has a higher volatility of 30.75% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 7.12%. This indicates that SMH3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMH3.LVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.75%

7.12%

+23.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.92%

12.70%

+55.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

97.22%

22.70%

+74.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

99.97%

22.22%

+77.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

99.97%

21.38%

+78.59%