METI.L vs. JEIP.L
METI.L (IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP) and JEIP.L (JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. METI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEIP.L.
Performance
METI.L vs. JEIP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
METI.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEIP.L
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 10.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METI.L vs. JEIP.L — Risk / Return Rank
METI.L
JEIP.L
METI.L vs. JEIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP (METI.L) and JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist (JEIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METI.L | JEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.62 | — |
Drawdowns
METI.L vs. JEIP.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METI.L | JEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -30.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -19.07% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -21.16% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.14% | — |
Volatility
METI.L vs. JEIP.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METI.L | JEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 8.42% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 20.08% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 20.08% | — |
METI.L vs. JEIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
METI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JEIP.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
METI.L vs. JEIP.L - Dividend Comparison
METI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEIP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEIP.L JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist | 8.25% | 7.18% | 0.61% |
METI.L IncomeShares META Options ETP GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, JEIP.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEIP.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for METI.L.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for METI.L and 0.35% for JEIP.L.
Find the right allocation for METI.L and JEIP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer