METD vs. TSLL
METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) and TSLL (Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while TSLL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METD returned 22.37% vs -4.45% for TSLL. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. METD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for TSLL.
Performance
METD vs. TSLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METD achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly higher than TSLL's -39.52% return.
METD
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- 11.25%
- YTD
- 15.72%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 22.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLL
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -27.36%
- YTD
- -39.52%
- 6M
- -48.29%
- 1Y
- -4.45%
- 3Y*
- -5.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METD vs. TSLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF | 15.72% | -17.33% | -15.84% |
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | -39.52% | -26.80% | 285.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between METD and TSLL is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METD vs. TSLL — Risk / Return Rank
METD
TSLL
METD vs. TSLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| METD | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.06 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | -0.08 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.10 | -0.16 | +2.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
METD vs. TSLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METD drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, smaller than the maximum TSLL drawdown of -82.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METD and TSLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METD | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.03% | -82.88% | +36.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.38% | -54.75% | +30.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -82.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.62% | -69.46% | +43.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.59% | -53.95% | +25.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.70% | 27.26% | -16.56% |
Volatility
METD vs. TSLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) is 13.19%, while Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) has a volatility of 27.91%. This indicates that METD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METD | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.19% | 27.91% | -14.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.43% | 56.62% | -28.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.55% | 87.40% | -50.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.62% | 106.79% | -70.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.62% | 106.79% | -70.17% |
METD vs. TSLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
METD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLL's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
METD vs. TSLL - Dividend Comparison
METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than TSLL's 8.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF | 2.39% | 3.35% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | 8.66% | 5.00% | 2.47% | 4.44% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METD and TSLL have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLL has higher volatility (27.91%) compared to METD (13.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METD dropped -46.03% vs TSLL's -82.88%.
On 1-year performance, METD leads with 22.37% vs -4.45% for TSLL. On fees, TSLL is cheaper at 0.83% per year. On volatility, METD has been the lower-risk option at 13.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, METD has performed better with a 22.37% return vs -4.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLL is cheaper with a 0.83% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for METD.
TSLL has the higher dividend yield at 8.66%, compared with 2.39% for METD.
METD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TSLL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for METD and 0.83% for TSLL.
METD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METD and TSLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer