METCB vs. SXC
METCB (Ramaco Resources Inc.) and SXC (SunCoke Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Coking Coal industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, METCB returned 76.20% vs 22.11% for SXC. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
METCB vs. SXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METCB achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly lower than SXC's 35.16% return.
METCB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 18.45%
- YTD
- 7.83%
- 6M
- -2.54%
- 1Y
- 76.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SXC
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 35.01%
- YTD
- 35.16%
- 6M
- 43.96%
- 1Y
- 22.11%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 7.03%
METCB vs. SXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
METCB Ramaco Resources Inc. | 7.83% | 25.90% | -17.35% | 24.77% |
SXC SunCoke Energy, Inc. | 35.16% | -28.61% | 3.95% | 37.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between METCB and SXC is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
METCB:
-$0.96
SXC:
-$0.77
METCB:
1.51
SXC:
0.44
METCB:
$523.58M
SXC:
$1.86B
METCB:
-$7.12M
SXC:
$114.40M
METCB:
$724.00K
SXC:
$98.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METCB vs. SXC — Risk / Return Rank
METCB
SXC
METCB vs. SXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ramaco Resources Inc. (METCB) and SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METCB | SXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.13 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 0.68 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.16 | 1.41 | +0.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METCB | SXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.52 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | -0.03 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
METCB vs. SXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METCB drawdown since its inception was -56.34%, smaller than the maximum SXC drawdown of -90.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METCB and SXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METCB | SXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.34% | -90.41% | +34.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.34% | -32.60% | -23.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -51.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -51.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.53% | -43.42% | +1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.28% | -48.81% | +19.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.47% | 15.69% | +19.78% |
Volatility
METCB vs. SXC - Volatility Comparison
Ramaco Resources Inc. (METCB) has a higher volatility of 19.16% compared to SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) at 9.68%. This indicates that METCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METCB | SXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.16% | 9.68% | +9.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.89% | 31.37% | +17.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.60% | 42.89% | +36.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.74% | 40.29% | +24.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.74% | 52.86% | +11.88% |
Dividends
METCB vs. SXC - Dividend Comparison
METCB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METCB Ramaco Resources Inc. | 0.00% | 3.18% | 9.36% | 3.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SXC SunCoke Energy, Inc. | 5.08% | 6.67% | 4.11% | 3.35% | 3.24% | 3.64% | 5.52% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.48% |
Financials
METCB vs. SXC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ramaco Resources Inc. and SunCoke Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
METCB vs. SXC - Profitability Comparison
METCB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 121.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SXC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SunCoke Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 455.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
METCB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources Inc. reported an operating income of -24.31M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in an operating margin of -20.0%.
SXC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SunCoke Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.40M and revenue of 455.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.
METCB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources Inc. reported a net income of -18.32M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in a net margin of -15.1%.
SXC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SunCoke Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -4.40M and revenue of 455.10M, resulting in a net margin of -1.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
METCB and SXC have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METCB has higher volatility (19.16%) compared to SXC (9.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METCB dropped -56.34% vs SXC's -90.41%.
METCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METCB and SXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer