META vs. XLE
META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock, while XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, META returned 19.38%/yr vs 9.38%/yr for XLE. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
META vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, META achieves a 3.40% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 28.11% return. Over the past 10 years, META has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 19.38%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.38% annualized return.
META
- 1D
- 3.07%
- 1M
- 14.80%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 3.40%
- 1Y
- -3.78%
- 3Y*
- 30.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.04%
- 10Y*
- 19.38%
XLE
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- 6M
- 19.18%
- YTD
- 28.11%
- 1Y
- 34.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- 22.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
META vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 3.40% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.11% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between META and XLE is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012 | 0.18 |
The correlation between META and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
META vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
META
XLE
META vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| META | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.27 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 2.29 | -2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 6.17 | -6.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
META vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| META | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -71.26% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.30% | -14.98% | -18.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.15% | -20.14% | -14.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | -26.04% | -50.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | -66.81% | -9.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.48% | -9.04% | -4.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.88% | -17.95% | +2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.53% | 5.54% | +11.99% |
Volatility
META vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a higher volatility of 16.03% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 7.06%. This indicates that META's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| META | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.03% | 7.06% | +8.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.01% | 16.68% | +14.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.56% | 21.00% | +17.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.57% | 25.90% | +18.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.98% | 29.58% | +9.40% |
Dividends
META vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than XLE's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.31% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.69% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
META and XLE have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
META has higher volatility (16.03%) compared to XLE (7.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs XLE's -71.26%.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for META and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer