PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
META vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

META vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -10.09% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 58.19% return. Over the past 10 years, META has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 17.64%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 36.02% annualized return.


META

1D
-5.51%
1M
-3.24%
YTD
-10.09%
6M
-11.79%
1Y
-13.11%
3Y*
30.15%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
17.64%

SMH

1D
-9.22%
1M
3.63%
YTD
58.19%
6M
56.81%
1Y
127.40%
3Y*
58.39%
5Y*
36.10%
10Y*
36.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

META vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-10.09%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
58.19%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between META and SMH is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012

0.48

The correlation between META and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

META vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

META vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


METASMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.59

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

8.58

-8.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.84

32.42

-33.26

META vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current META Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of META and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METASMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

4.00

-4.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

1.03

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

1.11

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.32

+0.22

Drawdowns

META vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METASMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.74%

-84.96%

+8.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.30%

-14.93%

-18.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.15%

-35.74%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.74%

-45.30%

-31.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.74%

-45.30%

-31.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.76%

-10.69%

-14.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.26%

-41.08%

+25.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.60%

3.94%

+11.66%

Volatility

META vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) is 10.46%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.88%. This indicates that META experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METASMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.46%

14.88%

-4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.14%

26.35%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.52%

32.03%

+3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.04%

35.24%

+8.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.68%

32.70%

+5.98%

Dividends

META vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, more than SMH's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.35%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.19%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


META and SMH have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to META (10.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs SMH's -84.96%.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for META and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer