PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
META vs. MSFT.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

META vs. MSFT.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

META is traded in USD, while MSFT.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the MSFT.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -9.93% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT.NEO's -19.49% return.


META

1D
4.77%
1M
-3.29%
YTD
-9.93%
6M
-8.18%
1Y
-12.74%
3Y*
28.68%
5Y*
12.58%
10Y*
18.14%

MSFT.NEO

1D
2.32%
1M
-6.65%
YTD
-19.49%
6M
-17.72%
1Y
-19.35%
3Y*
2.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

META vs. MSFT.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-9.93%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%3.10%
MSFT.NEO
Microsoft Corp CDR
-19.49%17.99%2.58%60.15%-33.47%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between META and MSFT.NEO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2021

0.56

The correlation between META and MSFT.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

META:

$1.52T

MSFT.NEO:

CA$209.09B

EPS

META:

$27.47

MSFT.NEO:

$14.11

PE Ratio

META:

21.61

MSFT.NEO:

1.43

PS Ratio

META:

7.10

MSFT.NEO:

0.51

PB Ratio

META:

6.24

MSFT.NEO:

0.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

META:

$214.96B

MSFT.NEO:

$293.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

META:

$176.14B

MSFT.NEO:

$202.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

META vs. MSFT.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT.NEO
MSFT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MSFT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

META vs. MSFT.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


METAMSFT.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.89

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

-0.57

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

-1.18

+0.38

META vs. MSFT.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current META Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is higher than the MSFT.NEO Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of META and MSFT.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

META vs. MSFT.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than MSFT.NEO's maximum drawdown of -42.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and MSFT.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METAMSFT.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.74%

-42.98%

-33.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.30%

-34.13%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.15%

-34.13%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.63%

-27.17%

+2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.83%

-14.17%

-1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.13%

16.49%

-0.36%

Volatility

META vs. MSFT.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) have volatilities of 11.35% and 10.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METAMSFT.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.35%

10.98%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.33%

22.91%

+4.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.89%

26.13%

+9.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.10%

27.83%

+16.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.72%

27.83%

+10.89%

Dividends

META vs. MSFT.NEO - Dividend Comparison

META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than MSFT.NEO's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.44%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT.NEO
Microsoft Corp CDR
0.89%0.70%0.73%0.75%1.07%0.19%

Financials

META vs. MSFT.NEO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Meta Platforms, Inc. and Microsoft Corp CDR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
56.31B
77.67B
(META) Total Revenue
(MSFT.NEO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

META vs. MSFT.NEO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Meta Platforms, Inc. and Microsoft Corp CDR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

70.0%75.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
81.9%
69.1%
Portfolio components
META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

MSFT.NEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corp CDR reported a gross profit of 53.63B and revenue of 77.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.1%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

MSFT.NEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corp CDR reported an operating income of 37.96B and revenue of 77.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.9%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.

MSFT.NEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corp CDR reported a net income of 27.75B and revenue of 77.67B, resulting in a net margin of 35.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


META and MSFT.NEO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for META and MSFT.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer