META vs. DOCS
META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) and DOCS (Doximity, Inc.) are both stocks. META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while DOCS operates in Health Information Services (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, META returned 9.53%/yr vs -19.51%/yr for DOCS. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
META vs. DOCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -15.51% return, which is significantly higher than DOCS's -52.78% return.
META
- 1D
- 3.28%
- 1M
- -9.17%
- 6M
- -22.16%
- YTD
- -15.51%
- 1Y
- -27.79%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- 16.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.02%
DOCS
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- 6M
- -44.20%
- YTD
- -52.78%
- 1Y
- -64.41%
- 3Y*
- -15.61%
- 5Y*
- -19.51%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -12.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
DOCS Doximity, Inc. | $69.10M | $63.08M | $85.82M |
| $9.87B | $11.79B | $10.93B |
META vs. DOCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -15.51% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | -1.24% |
DOCS Doximity, Inc. | -52.78% | -17.06% | 90.41% | -16.45% | -33.05% | 21.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between META and DOCS is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.40 |
The correlation between META and DOCS shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
META:
$1.42T
DOCS:
$3.91B
META:
$26.51
DOCS:
$0.99
META:
21.00
DOCS:
21.15
META:
0.86
DOCS:
1.80
META:
6.27
DOCS:
6.43
META:
5.47
DOCS:
4.29
META:
$228.25B
DOCS:
$644.86M
META:
$186.59B
DOCS:
$574.54M
META:
$107.07B
DOCS:
$245.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
META vs. DOCS — Risk / Return Rank
META
DOCS
META vs. DOCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Doximity, Inc. (DOCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| META | DOCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.73 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | -0.85 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | -1.23 | -0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
META vs. DOCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, smaller than the maximum DOCS drawdown of -82.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and DOCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| META | DOCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -82.35% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.30% | -76.03% | +42.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.15% | -78.34% | +44.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | -82.35% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.30% | -79.50% | +50.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.90% | -57.75% | +41.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.25% | 52.35% | -34.10% |
Volatility
META vs. DOCS - Volatility Comparison
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a higher volatility of 15.37% compared to Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) at 10.69%. This indicates that META's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| META | DOCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.37% | 10.69% | +4.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.29% | 45.39% | -15.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.78% | 54.64% | -14.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.68% | 67.87% | -23.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.10% | 69.45% | -30.35% |
Dividends
META vs. DOCS - Dividend Comparison
META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while DOCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DOCS Doximity, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.38% | 0.32% | 0.34% |
Financials
META vs. DOCS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Meta Platforms, Inc. and Doximity, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
META vs. DOCS - Profitability Comparison
META - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 49.47B and revenue of 60.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.
DOCS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Doximity, Inc. reported a gross profit of 125.97M and revenue of 145.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.7%.
META - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.78B and revenue of 60.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.
DOCS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Doximity, Inc. reported an operating income of 24.83M and revenue of 145.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.
META - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 15.85B and revenue of 60.80B, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.
DOCS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Doximity, Inc. reported a net income of 19.11M and revenue of 145.37M, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
META and DOCS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
META has higher volatility (15.37%) compared to DOCS (10.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs DOCS's -82.35%.
META currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.73 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for META and DOCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer