PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MERDX vs. MVALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MERDX vs. MVALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meridian Growth Fund (MERDX) and Meridian Contrarian Fund (MVALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MERDX achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than MVALX's 16.52% return. Over the past 10 years, MERDX has underperformed MVALX with an annualized return of 7.64%, while MVALX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.90% annualized return.


MERDX

1D
0.78%
1M
3.27%
YTD
7.16%
6M
5.08%
1Y
7.25%
3Y*
3.60%
5Y*
-2.42%
10Y*
7.64%

MVALX

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.91%
YTD
16.52%
6M
14.31%
1Y
30.86%
3Y*
16.55%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
13.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MERDX vs. MVALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MERDX
Meridian Growth Fund
7.16%-6.25%6.42%15.29%-29.13%15.58%24.93%27.67%-7.30%25.64%
MVALX
Meridian Contrarian Fund
16.52%17.43%9.73%12.40%-16.67%26.66%23.75%23.66%-7.85%24.88%

Correlation

The correlation between MERDX and MVALX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 1994

0.88

The correlation between MERDX and MVALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MERDX vs. MVALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MERDX
MERDX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MERDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MERDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
MERDX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MERDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
MERDX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

MVALX
MVALX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MVALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVALX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MVALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVALX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MERDX vs. MVALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meridian Growth Fund (MERDX) and Meridian Contrarian Fund (MVALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MERDXMVALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.28

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

2.88

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.52

10.08

-8.56

MERDX vs. MVALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MERDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the MVALX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MERDX and MVALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MERDX vs. MVALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MERDX drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, roughly equal to the maximum MVALX drawdown of -50.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MERDX and MVALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MERDXMVALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.45%

-50.65%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.50%

-11.53%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.32%

-24.80%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.93%

-24.80%

-13.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.64%

-42.06%

+1.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.35%

-0.90%

-18.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.29%

-7.11%

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

3.27%

+2.03%

Volatility

MERDX vs. MVALX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meridian Growth Fund (MERDX) is 5.75%, while Meridian Contrarian Fund (MVALX) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that MERDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MERDXMVALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

6.99%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

15.19%

-2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.75%

19.78%

-2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.54%

20.84%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.36%

21.50%

-0.14%

MERDX vs. MVALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MERDX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MVALX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

MERDX vs. MVALX - Dividend Comparison

MERDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.42%, less than MVALX's 10.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MERDX
Meridian Growth Fund
8.42%9.03%0.24%0.00%13.80%15.49%0.88%9.15%16.44%7.07%0.57%12.17%
MVALX
Meridian Contrarian Fund
10.99%12.81%4.26%5.45%11.45%14.16%4.93%7.94%25.52%10.53%0.52%16.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


MERDX and MVALX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MVALX has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to MERDX (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MERDX dropped -48.45% vs MVALX's -50.65%.

MVALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MERDX and MVALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer