MEMX vs. SLV
Compare and contrast key facts about Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV).
MEMX and SLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MEMX is an actively managed fund by Matthews. It was launched on Jan 10, 2023. SLV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price. It was launched on Apr 21, 2006.
Performance
MEMX vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MEMX vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MEMX Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF | 7.64% | 35.88% | 5.50% | 10.52% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 5.77% | 144.66% | 20.89% | 1.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEMX achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 5.77% return.
MEMX
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -7.96%
- YTD
- 7.64%
- 6M
- 20.48%
- 1Y
- 51.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -16.46%
- YTD
- 5.77%
- 6M
- 58.80%
- 1Y
- 122.46%
- 3Y*
- 45.50%
- 5Y*
- 24.10%
- 10Y*
- 16.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MEMX vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MEMX vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
MEMX
SLV
MEMX vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MEMX | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 2.16 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.19 | 2.23 | +0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.40 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 2.82 | +0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.46 | 8.70 | +5.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MEMX | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 2.16 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.25 | +0.88 |
Correlation
The correlation between MEMX and SLV is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MEMX vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
MEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MEMX Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF | 4.54% | 4.88% | 0.99% | 1.13% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MEMX vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEMX drawdown since its inception was -19.27%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEMX and SLV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEMX | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.27% | -76.28% | +57.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.70% | -42.45% | +27.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.31% | -35.47% | +25.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -44.76% | +41.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 13.77% | -10.21% |
Volatility
MEMX vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) is 10.72%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.96%. This indicates that MEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MEMX | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.72% | 16.96% | -6.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.25% | 57.27% | -41.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.41% | 57.07% | -36.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 35.27% | -19.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 31.35% | -15.28% |