MEMX vs. MEM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MEMX (Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF) and MEM (Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from Matthews. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MEMX returned 20.99%/yr vs 18.39%/yr for MEM. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

MEMX vs. MEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) and Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEMX achieves a 20.25% return, which is significantly higher than MEM's 19.05% return.

MEMX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -5.81%
• 6M: 10.01%
• YTD: 20.25%
• 1Y: 45.59%
• 3Y*: 20.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.15%

MEM

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -2.31%
• 6M: 9.52%
• YTD: 19.05%
• 1Y: 36.76%
• 3Y*: 18.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MEM Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF	$91.77K	$110.69K	$126.59K
MEMX Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF	$126.06K	$154.77K	$150.51K

MEMX vs. MEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MEMX Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF	20.25%	35.88%	5.50%	11.33%
MEM Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF	19.05%	28.31%	10.11%	2.54%

Correlation

The correlation between MEMX and MEM is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2023	0.88

The correlation between MEMX and MEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

MEMX vs. MEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MEMX	MEM
Technology	52.1%	45.6%
Financial Services	21.4%	23.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.2%	6.8%
Industrials	7.1%	7.8%
Basic Materials	2.9%	7.7%
Healthcare	2.6%	0.6%
Energy	2.0%	2.0%
Communication Services	1.7%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	1.4%
Real Estate	0.9%	-
Utilities	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

MEMX vs. MEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MEMX

MEMX Risk / Return Rank: 74
MEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
MEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
MEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
MEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

MEM

MEM Risk / Return Rank: 61
MEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
MEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
MEM Omega Ratio Rank: 60
MEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
MEM Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MEMX vs. MEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) and Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MEMX	MEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.42	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	1.98	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.26	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	2.43	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.02	6.94	+2.08

MEMX vs. MEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the MEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEMX and MEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MEMX vs. MEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEMX drawdown since its inception was -19.27%, roughly equal to the maximum MEM drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEMX and MEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEMX	MEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.27%	-19.10%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.84%	-14.62%	-2.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.27%	-19.10%	-0.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.57%	-10.05%	-2.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-4.84%	+1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.99%	5.10%	-0.11%

Volatility

MEMX vs. MEM - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.83% compared to Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (MEM) at 8.37%. This indicates that MEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEMX	MEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.83%	8.37%	+1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.48%	22.50%	+1.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.49%	24.96%	+1.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.76%	19.37%	-0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.76%	19.37%	-0.61%

MEMX vs. MEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MEMX and MEM have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

MEMX vs. MEM - Dividend Comparison

MEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than MEM's 2.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MEM Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF	2.99%	3.56%	7.81%	0.01%	0.53%
MEMX Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF	4.06%	4.88%	0.99%	1.13%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEMX and MEM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, MEMX and MEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MEMX or MEM?

MEMX has higher volatility (9.83%) compared to MEM (8.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEMX dropped -19.27% vs MEM's -19.10%.

Which ETF is better, MEMX or MEM?

On 3-year performance, MEMX leads with 20.99% vs 18.39% for MEM. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, MEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MEMX or MEM?

Over the 3-year period, MEMX has performed better with a 20.99% return vs 18.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEMX or MEM?

MEMX and MEM have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MEMX or MEM?

MEMX has the higher dividend yield at 4.06%, compared with 2.99% for MEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.