PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEMX vs. SGRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEMX vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEMX achieves a 20.25% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 25.07% return.


MEMX

1D
0.27%
1M
-5.81%
6M
10.01%
YTD
20.25%
1Y
45.59%
3Y*
20.99%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.15%

SGRT

1D
-0.19%
1M
-7.04%
6M
20.49%
YTD
25.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$126.06K$154.77K$150.51K
$998.46K$1.36M$2.23M

MEMX vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MEMX and SGRT is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEMX vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MEMX
MEMX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
MEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SGRT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MEMX vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MEMXSGRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.02

MEMX vs. SGRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MEMX vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEMX drawdown since its inception was -19.27%, smaller than the maximum SGRT drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEMX and SGRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEMXSGRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.27%

-24.98%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.57%

-18.61%

+6.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-4.25%

+0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.99%

Volatility

MEMX vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEMXSGRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.49%

38.93%

-12.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.76%

38.93%

-20.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.76%

38.93%

-20.17%

MEMX vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEMX vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

MEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than SGRT's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MEMX
Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF
4.06%4.88%0.99%1.13%
SGRT
SMART Earnings Growth ETF
0.13%0.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEMX and SGRT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MEMX.

MEMX has the higher dividend yield at 4.06%, compared with 0.13% for SGRT.

MEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SGRT is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MEMX and 0.59% for SGRT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEMX and SGRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer