MEMX vs. LRCU

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

MEMX (Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Matthews, while LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MEMX charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for LRCU.

Performance

MEMX vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEMX achieves a 34.10% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 314.98% return.

MEMX

• 1D: 3.31%
• 1M: 8.49%
• YTD: 34.10%
• 6M: 43.05%
• 1Y: 68.84%
• 3Y*: 25.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRCU

• 1D: 12.70%
• 1M: 77.20%
• YTD: 314.98%
• 6M: 346.56%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEMX vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MEMX Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF	34.10%	16.89%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	314.98%	172.36%

Correlation

The correlation between MEMX and LRCU is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

MEMX vs. LRCU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEMX

MEMX Risk / Return Rank: 89
MEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
MEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
MEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
MEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
MEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

LRCU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEMX vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MEMX	LRCU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.94	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.71	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.06	—	—

Drawdowns

MEMX vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEMX drawdown since its inception was -19.27%, smaller than the maximum LRCU drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEMX and LRCU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEMX	LRCU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.27%	-40.09%	+20.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	0.00%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.50%	-9.29%	+5.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MEMX	LRCU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.30%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.45%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.60%	114.38%	-90.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.81%	114.38%	-96.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.81%	114.38%	-96.57%

MEMX vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEMX vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison

MEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, while LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MEMX Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF	3.64%	4.88%	0.99%	1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEMX and LRCU in my portfolio?

MEMX and LRCU have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MEMX or LRCU?

On fees, MEMX is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEMX or LRCU?

MEMX is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MEMX or LRCU?

MEMX has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.

What is the main difference between MEMX and LRCU?

MEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while LRCU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MEMX and 1.30% for LRCU.