PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEMX vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEMX vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEMX achieves a 23.89% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 66.08% return.


MEMX

1D
-3.50%
1M
-4.56%
6M
17.40%
YTD
23.89%
1Y
49.73%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
6.87%
1M
-1.18%
6M
62.18%
YTD
66.08%
1Y
53.22%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
16.54%
10Y*
11.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEMX vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MEMX
Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF
23.89%35.88%5.50%11.33%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
66.08%-2.17%2.96%-6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MEMX and DBE is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2023

0.03

The correlation between MEMX and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEMX vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEMX
MEMX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEMX vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MEMXDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.26

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

2.16

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.15

6.57

+5.59

MEMX vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEMX and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MEMX vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEMX drawdown since its inception was -19.27%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEMX and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEMXDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.27%

-86.69%

+67.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.70%

-24.72%

+10.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.27%

-24.72%

+5.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.93%

-36.95%

+27.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-57.20%

+53.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

8.13%

-4.03%

Volatility

MEMX vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) have volatilities of 11.99% and 12.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEMXDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.99%

12.49%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.44%

32.73%

-9.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.41%

36.03%

-10.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.43%

29.89%

-11.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

28.40%

-9.97%

MEMX vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEMX vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

MEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than DBE's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.33%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
MEMX
Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF
3.94%4.88%0.99%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEMX and DBE have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.49%) compared to MEMX (11.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEMX dropped -19.27% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 3-year performance, MEMX leads with 22.25% vs 17.13% for DBE. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, MEMX has been the lower-risk option at 11.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MEMX has performed better with a 22.25% return vs 17.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MEMX.

MEMX has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 2.33% for DBE.

MEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MEMX and 0.78% for DBE.

MEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEMX and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer