PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEGMX vs. WAEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEGMX vs. WAEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEGMX achieves a 21.66% return, which is significantly higher than WAEMX's 12.35% return.


MEGMX

1D
4.40%
1M
-4.18%
6M
11.77%
YTD
21.66%
1Y
38.98%
3Y*
19.70%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.83%

WAEMX

1D
2.14%
1M
-9.48%
6M
8.52%
YTD
12.35%
1Y
21.10%
3Y*
8.36%
5Y*
-1.08%
10Y*
6.63%
ALL TIME*
5.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MEGMX vs. WAEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MEGMX
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund
21.66%29.37%11.11%8.46%-20.94%-1.90%61.26%
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
12.35%5.85%-2.21%21.20%-38.76%30.16%55.76%

Correlation

The correlation between MEGMX and WAEMX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2020

0.69

The correlation between MEGMX and WAEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEGMX vs. WAEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MEGMX
MEGMX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MEGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MEGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

WAEMX
WAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
WAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
WAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MEGMX vs. WAEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MEGMXWAEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.19

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

1.50

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.13

5.85

+1.28

MEGMX vs. WAEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEGMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the WAEMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEGMX and WAEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MEGMX vs. WAEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEGMX drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, smaller than the maximum WAEMX drawdown of -66.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEGMX and WAEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEGMXWAEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.64%

-66.35%

+28.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.26%

-13.82%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-25.56%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.81%

-44.88%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.58%

-16.88%

+4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.40%

-16.76%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

3.54%

+1.69%

Volatility

MEGMX vs. WAEMX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) has a higher volatility of 9.88% compared to Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) at 7.47%. This indicates that MEGMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEGMXWAEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.88%

7.47%

+2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.68%

17.62%

+6.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.41%

19.95%

+5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.91%

18.25%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.73%

18.40%

+0.33%

MEGMX vs. WAEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEGMX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than WAEMX's 1.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEGMX vs. WAEMX - Dividend Comparison

MEGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than WAEMX's 62.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEGMX
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.44%2.97%0.92%1.82%1.81%7.76%2.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
62.66%70.40%6.49%0.00%3.32%6.03%7.15%5.82%12.81%0.00%0.00%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEGMX and WAEMX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEGMX has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to WAEMX (7.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEGMX dropped -37.64% vs WAEMX's -66.35%.

MEGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEGMX and WAEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer