PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAPTX vs. PRIDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAPTX vs. PRIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX) and T. Rowe Price International Discovery Fund (PRIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAPTX achieves a 19.29% return, which is significantly higher than PRIDX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, MAPTX has underperformed PRIDX with an annualized return of 4.96%, while PRIDX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.91% annualized return.


MAPTX

1D
4.12%
1M
-5.17%
6M
11.07%
YTD
19.29%
1Y
38.26%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*
4.96%
ALL TIME*
7.54%

PRIDX

1D
2.40%
1M
0.62%
6M
3.95%
YTD
9.53%
1Y
19.81%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
8.91%
ALL TIME*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MAPTX vs. PRIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAPTX
Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund
19.29%30.07%3.25%-4.82%-20.69%-17.92%28.88%10.75%-11.05%39.94%
PRIDX
T. Rowe Price International Discovery Fund
9.53%25.53%3.65%13.19%-30.34%7.31%38.78%25.01%-17.54%38.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MAPTX and PRIDX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 1994

0.66

The correlation between MAPTX and PRIDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAPTX vs. PRIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAPTX
MAPTX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MAPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MAPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

PRIDX
PRIDX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PRIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAPTX vs. PRIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX) and T. Rowe Price International Discovery Fund (PRIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAPTXPRIDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

1.42

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.98

5.12

+1.86

MAPTX vs. PRIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAPTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the PRIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAPTX and PRIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAPTX vs. PRIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAPTX drawdown since its inception was -69.79%, which is greater than PRIDX's maximum drawdown of -65.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAPTX and PRIDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAPTXPRIDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.79%

-65.01%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.30%

-13.50%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.23%

-15.86%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.28%

-43.86%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.31%

-43.86%

-8.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.89%

-0.94%

-12.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.40%

-16.30%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.18%

3.74%

+1.44%

Volatility

MAPTX vs. PRIDX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to T. Rowe Price International Discovery Fund (PRIDX) at 5.29%. This indicates that MAPTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAPTXPRIDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.17%

5.29%

+4.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.53%

13.32%

+10.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.40%

15.43%

+9.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.18%

16.90%

+4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.89%

16.55%

+2.34%

MAPTX vs. PRIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAPTX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PRIDX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAPTX vs. PRIDX - Dividend Comparison

MAPTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than PRIDX's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAPTX
Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund
1.95%2.33%8.93%2.93%8.52%4.85%5.74%3.44%4.78%1.25%2.61%11.18%
PRIDX
T. Rowe Price International Discovery Fund
4.46%4.88%4.03%2.05%3.18%15.35%4.30%1.48%6.20%3.11%1.81%5.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAPTX and PRIDX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAPTX has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to PRIDX (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAPTX dropped -69.79% vs PRIDX's -65.01%.

MAPTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAPTX and PRIDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer