MEDX vs. YNOT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

MEDX (Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF) and YNOT (Horizon Digital Frontier ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MEDX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Horizon, while YNOT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Horizon. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MEDX returned 28.56% vs 21.55% for YNOT. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MEDX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for YNOT.

Performance

MEDX vs. YNOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) and Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEDX achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly lower than YNOT's 10.06% return.

MEDX

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 3.47%
• 6M: 6.78%
• YTD: 6.55%
• 1Y: 28.56%
• 3Y*: 8.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

YNOT

• 1D: -2.95%
• 1M: -5.80%
• 6M: 4.75%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 1Y: 21.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEDX vs. YNOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MEDX Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF	6.55%	20.72%
YNOT Horizon Digital Frontier ETF	10.06%	12.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MEDX and YNOT is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025	0.06

MEDX vs. YNOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MEDX	YNOT
Healthcare	100.0%	0.7%
Basic Materials	-	8.3%
Communication Services	-	14.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.6%
Financial Services	-	1.8%
Industrials	-	15.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	48.5%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

MEDX vs. YNOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEDX

MEDX Risk / Return Rank: 59
MEDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
MEDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
MEDX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
MEDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
MEDX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

YNOT

YNOT Risk / Return Rank: 30
YNOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
YNOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
YNOT Omega Ratio Rank: 27
YNOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
YNOT Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEDX vs. YNOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) and Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MEDX	YNOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	0.87	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	1.28	+1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.16	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	1.29	+1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.29	3.85	+3.44

MEDX vs. YNOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the YNOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEDX and YNOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MEDX vs. YNOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEDX drawdown since its inception was -23.10%, which is greater than YNOT's maximum drawdown of -16.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDX and YNOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEDX	YNOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.10%	-16.73%	-6.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.54%	-16.73%	+6.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.14%	-11.21%	+5.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.58%	-4.16%	-2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	5.61%	-1.68%

Volatility

MEDX vs. YNOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) is 7.07%, while Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that MEDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YNOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEDX	YNOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.07%	8.33%	-1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.26%	20.31%	-6.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.98%	24.76%	-5.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.21%	24.63%	-7.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.21%	24.63%	-7.42%

MEDX vs. YNOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEDX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than YNOT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEDX vs. YNOT - Dividend Comparison

MEDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while YNOT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MEDX Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF	1.16%	1.23%	1.92%	4.94%
YNOT Horizon Digital Frontier ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEDX and YNOT in my portfolio?

MEDX and YNOT have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MEDX or YNOT?

YNOT has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to MEDX (7.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEDX dropped -23.10% vs YNOT's -16.73%.

Which ETF is better, MEDX or YNOT?

On 1-year performance, MEDX leads with 28.56% vs 21.55% for YNOT. On fees, YNOT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MEDX has been the lower-risk option at 7.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MEDX or YNOT?

Over the 1-year period, MEDX has performed better with a 28.56% return vs 21.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEDX or YNOT?

YNOT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MEDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MEDX or YNOT?

MEDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.00% for YNOT.

What is the main difference between MEDX and YNOT?

MEDX is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while YNOT is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MEDX and 0.75% for YNOT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MEDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.