PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEDX vs. BCDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MEDX vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MEDX vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MEDX
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF
0.32%28.62%-4.68%-6.22%
BCDF
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF
1.72%11.63%14.87%15.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEDX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's 1.72% return.


MEDX

1D
2.94%
1M
-5.94%
YTD
0.32%
6M
12.78%
1Y
21.85%
3Y*
6.41%
5Y*
10Y*

BCDF

1D
2.24%
1M
-3.88%
YTD
1.72%
6M
-0.09%
1Y
13.04%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MEDX vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MEDX and BCDF have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Return for Risk

MEDX vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEDX
MEDX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MEDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MEDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

BCDF
BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEDX vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEDXBCDFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

0.78

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.52

1.19

+0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.15

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

1.40

+0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.47

3.61

+1.86

MEDX vs. BCDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the BCDF Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEDX and BCDF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEDXBCDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

0.78

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.38

-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between MEDX and BCDF is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MEDX vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

MEDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than BCDF's 2.48% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
MEDX
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF
1.23%1.23%1.92%4.94%0.00%
BCDF
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF
2.48%2.53%1.63%0.69%0.38%

Drawdowns

MEDX vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEDX drawdown since its inception was -23.10%, smaller than the maximum BCDF drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDX and BCDF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MEDXBCDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.10%

-27.70%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.86%

-8.84%

-2.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.03%

-5.09%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-10.23%

+3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.02%

3.44%

+0.58%

Volatility

MEDX vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) at 5.22%. This indicates that MEDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MEDXBCDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

5.22%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.58%

11.75%

+1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.45%

16.82%

+4.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

17.06%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

17.06%

-0.15%