MEDX vs. CANC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

MEDX (Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF) and CANC (Tema Oncology ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MEDX returned 8.26%/yr vs 108.39%/yr for CANC. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MEDX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CANC.

Performance

MEDX vs. CANC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEDX achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly lower than CANC's 16.66% return.

MEDX

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 3.47%
• 6M: 6.78%
• YTD: 6.55%
• 1Y: 28.56%
• 3Y*: 8.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CANC

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 8.94%
• 6M: 10.55%
• YTD: 16.66%
• 1Y: 54.48%
• 3Y*: 108.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEDX vs. CANC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MEDX Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF	6.55%	28.62%	-4.68%	-5.77%
CANC Tema Oncology ETF	16.66%	42.92%	-5.37%	462.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MEDX and CANC is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023	0.63

The correlation between MEDX and CANC shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MEDX vs. CANC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MEDX	CANC
Healthcare	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MEDX vs. CANC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEDX

MEDX Risk / Return Rank: 59
MEDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
MEDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
MEDX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
MEDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
MEDX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

CANC

CANC Risk / Return Rank: 89
CANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
CANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CANC Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CANC Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEDX vs. CANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MEDX	CANC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.42	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	3.42	-1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.39	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	5.89	-3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.29	15.89	-8.60

MEDX vs. CANC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the CANC Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEDX and CANC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MEDX vs. CANC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEDX drawdown since its inception was -23.10%, smaller than the maximum CANC drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDX and CANC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEDX	CANC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.10%	-97.53%	+74.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.54%	-9.30%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.10%	-30.27%	+7.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.14%	-51.64%	+45.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.58%	-72.65%	+66.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	3.44%	+0.49%

Volatility

MEDX vs. CANC - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) at 6.45%. This indicates that MEDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEDX	CANC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.07%	6.45%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.26%	16.40%	-2.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.98%	22.74%	-3.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.21%	276.80%	-259.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.21%	276.80%	-259.59%

MEDX vs. CANC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEDX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CANC's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEDX vs. CANC - Dividend Comparison

MEDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than CANC's 0.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CANC Tema Oncology ETF	0.05%	0.06%	3.00%	0.56%
MEDX Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF	1.16%	1.23%	1.92%	4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEDX and CANC in my portfolio?

MEDX and CANC have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MEDX or CANC?

MEDX has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to CANC (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEDX dropped -23.10% vs CANC's -97.53%.

Which ETF is better, MEDX or CANC?

On 3-year performance, CANC leads with 108.39% vs 8.26% for MEDX. On fees, CANC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CANC has been the lower-risk option at 6.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MEDX or CANC?

Over the 3-year period, CANC has performed better with a 108.39% return vs 8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEDX or CANC?

CANC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MEDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MEDX or CANC?

MEDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.05% for CANC.

What is the main difference between MEDX and CANC?

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MEDX and 0.75% for CANC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CANC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.