PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEDX vs. BENJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEDX vs. BENJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) and Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEDX achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly higher than BENJ's 1.46% return.


MEDX

1D
3.04%
1M
5.53%
YTD
3.90%
6M
3.58%
1Y
32.14%
3Y*
6.55%
5Y*
10Y*

BENJ

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEDX vs. BENJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MEDX
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF
3.90%25.90%
BENJ
Horizon Landmark ETF
1.46%3.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MEDX and BENJ is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEDX vs. BENJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEDX
MEDX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MEDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MEDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

BENJ
BENJ Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BENJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BENJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BENJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BENJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BENJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEDX vs. BENJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) and Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEDXBENJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

4.95

-3.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

9.71

-6.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.51

45.83

-37.31

MEDX vs. BENJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the BENJ Sharpe Ratio of 5.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEDX and BENJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEDXBENJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

5.65

-3.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

6.41

-6.09

Drawdowns

MEDX vs. BENJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEDX drawdown since its inception was -23.10%, which is greater than BENJ's maximum drawdown of -0.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDX and BENJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEDXBENJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.10%

-0.39%

-22.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.54%

-0.39%

-10.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-0.01%

-2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-0.02%

-6.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

0.08%

+3.71%

Volatility

MEDX vs. BENJ - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) at 0.07%. This indicates that MEDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BENJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEDXBENJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

0.07%

+5.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.41%

0.23%

+13.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.12%

0.67%

+17.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

0.60%

+16.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

0.60%

+16.44%

MEDX vs. BENJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEDX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BENJ's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEDX vs. BENJ - Dividend Comparison

MEDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while BENJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BENJ
Horizon Landmark ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MEDX
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF
1.19%1.23%1.92%4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEDX and BENJ have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEDX has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to BENJ (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEDX dropped -23.10% vs BENJ's -0.39%.

On 1-year performance, MEDX leads with 32.14% vs 3.78% for BENJ. On fees, BENJ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BENJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MEDX has performed better with a 32.14% return vs 3.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BENJ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MEDX.

MEDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.00% for BENJ.

MEDX is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while BENJ is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MEDX and 0.40% for BENJ.

BENJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.65 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEDX and BENJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer