MEDP vs. EWP
MEDP (Medpace Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while EWP (iShares MSCI Spain ETF) is Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Spain Index. Over the past 5 years, MEDP returned 21.69%/yr vs 17.57%/yr for EWP. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MEDP vs. EWP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEDP achieves a -16.79% return, which is significantly lower than EWP's 8.89% return.
MEDP
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 10.28%
- YTD
- -16.79%
- 6M
- -16.23%
- 1Y
- 53.73%
- 3Y*
- 28.75%
- 5Y*
- 21.69%
- 10Y*
- —
EWP
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 4.02%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 6M
- 11.54%
- 1Y
- 36.89%
- 3Y*
- 32.21%
- 5Y*
- 17.57%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
MEDP vs. EWP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc. | -16.79% | 69.05% | 8.38% | 44.31% | -2.40% | 56.35% | 65.60% | 58.81% | 45.97% | 0.53% |
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 8.89% | 78.03% | 5.70% | 30.26% | -5.18% | 0.25% | -3.94% | 11.93% | -15.32% | 26.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEDP and EWP is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2016 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEDP vs. EWP — Risk / Return Rank
MEDP
EWP
MEDP vs. EWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MEDP | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 3.26 | -1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.28 | 11.51 | -8.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MEDP vs. EWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEDP drawdown since its inception was -42.87%, smaller than the maximum EWP drawdown of -61.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDP and EWP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEDP | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.87% | -61.19% | +18.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -11.38% | -25.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.38% | -12.19% | -27.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.87% | -33.91% | -8.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.69% | 0.00% | -24.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.92% | -21.41% | +8.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.45% | 3.22% | +13.23% |
Volatility
MEDP vs. EWP - Volatility Comparison
Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) at 6.21%. This indicates that MEDP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEDP | EWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 6.21% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.78% | 16.09% | +21.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.99% | 19.13% | +49.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.61% | 20.31% | +31.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.76% | 22.22% | +27.54% |
Dividends
MEDP vs. EWP - Dividend Comparison
MEDP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 2.09% | 2.27% | 4.35% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 3.29% | 2.56% | 3.72% | 3.69% | 2.72% | 4.65% | 3.85% |
MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MEDP and EWP have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MEDP has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to EWP (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEDP dropped -42.87% vs EWP's -61.19%.
EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MEDP and EWP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer