MEDI vs. GERM
MEDI (Harbor Health Care ETF) and GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. MEDI is actively managed, while GERM is passively managed. Over the past year, MEDI returned 18.27% vs 0.00% for GERM. MEDI charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for GERM.
Performance
MEDI vs. GERM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MEDI
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- -4.02%
- 6M
- -4.83%
- 1Y
- 18.27%
- 3Y*
- 12.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GERM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEDI vs. GERM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MEDI Harbor Health Care ETF | -4.02% | 27.11% | -5.61% |
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MEDI vs. GERM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MEDI
GERM
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
MEDI
GERM
Basic Materials
MEDI
-
GERM
-
Communication Services
MEDI
-
GERM
-
Consumer Cyclical
MEDI
-
GERM
-
Consumer Defensive
MEDI
-
GERM
-
Energy
MEDI
-
GERM
-
Financial Services
MEDI
-
GERM
Industrials
MEDI
-
GERM
-
Real Estate
MEDI
-
GERM
-
Technology
MEDI
-
GERM
-
Utilities
MEDI
-
GERM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEDI vs. GERM — Risk / Return Rank
MEDI
GERM
MEDI vs. GERM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) and Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MEDI | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.59 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MEDI | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | — | — |
Drawdowns
MEDI vs. GERM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEDI drawdown since its inception was -19.24%, which is greater than GERM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDI and GERM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEDI | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.24% | 0.00% | -19.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.34% | 0.00% | -15.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | 0.00% | -8.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.28% | 0.00% | -4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 0.00% | +5.10% |
Volatility
MEDI vs. GERM - Volatility Comparison
Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) at 0.00%. This indicates that MEDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GERM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEDI | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 0.00% | +6.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.42% | 0.00% | +15.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.82% | 0.00% | +19.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 0.00% | +18.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 0.00% | +18.63% |
MEDI vs. GERM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEDI has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GERM's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
MEDI vs. GERM - Dividend Comparison
MEDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MEDI Harbor Health Care ETF | 0.29% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 1.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MEDI has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEDI dropped -19.24% vs GERM's 0.00%.
On 1-year performance, MEDI leads with 18.27% vs 0.00% for GERM. On fees, GERM is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MEDI has performed better with a 18.27% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GERM is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for MEDI.
MEDI has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for MEDI and 0.68% for GERM.
Find the right allocation for MEDI and GERM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer