MEDI vs. EPEM
MEDI (Harbor Health Care ETF) and EPEM (Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MEDI is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while EPEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Harbor. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MEDI charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for EPEM.
Performance
MEDI vs. EPEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEDI achieves a -4.02% return, which is significantly lower than EPEM's 29.54% return.
MEDI
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- -4.02%
- 6M
- -4.83%
- 1Y
- 18.27%
- 3Y*
- 12.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPEM
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- 7.99%
- YTD
- 29.54%
- 6M
- 31.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEDI vs. EPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MEDI Harbor Health Care ETF | -4.02% | 21.72% |
EPEM Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 29.54% | 20.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEDI and EPEM is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.23 |
MEDI vs. EPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MEDI
EPEM
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
MEDI
EPEM
Basic Materials
MEDI
-
EPEM
Communication Services
MEDI
-
EPEM
Consumer Cyclical
MEDI
-
EPEM
Consumer Defensive
MEDI
-
EPEM
Energy
MEDI
-
EPEM
Financial Services
MEDI
-
EPEM
Industrials
MEDI
-
EPEM
Real Estate
MEDI
-
EPEM
Technology
MEDI
-
EPEM
Utilities
MEDI
-
EPEM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEDI vs. EPEM — Risk / Return Rank
MEDI
EPEM
MEDI vs. EPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) and Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MEDI | EPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.59 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MEDI | EPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 2.96 | -2.23 |
Drawdowns
MEDI vs. EPEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEDI drawdown since its inception was -19.24%, which is greater than EPEM's maximum drawdown of -13.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDI and EPEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEDI | EPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.24% | -13.27% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -1.69% | -6.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.28% | -1.96% | -2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | — | — |
Volatility
MEDI vs. EPEM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEDI | EPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.82% | 19.37% | +0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 19.37% | -0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 19.37% | -0.74% |
MEDI vs. EPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEDI has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than EPEM's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
MEDI vs. EPEM - Dividend Comparison
MEDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than EPEM's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EPEM Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.83% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MEDI Harbor Health Care ETF | 0.29% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 1.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MEDI and EPEM have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MEDI is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MEDI is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for EPEM.
EPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 0.29% for MEDI.
MEDI is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while EPEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for MEDI and 0.84% for EPEM.
Find the right allocation for MEDI and EPEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer