PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEDI vs. EPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEDI vs. EPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) and Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEDI achieves a -4.02% return, which is significantly lower than EPEM's 29.54% return.


MEDI

1D
1.06%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
-4.02%
6M
-4.83%
1Y
18.27%
3Y*
12.46%
5Y*
10Y*

EPEM

1D
-1.69%
1M
7.99%
YTD
29.54%
6M
31.79%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEDI vs. EPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MEDI
Harbor Health Care ETF
-4.02%21.72%
EPEM
Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
29.54%20.76%

Correlation

The correlation between MEDI and EPEM is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.23

MEDI vs. EPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MEDI
EPEM

Healthcare

100.0%
2.1%

Basic Materials

-

6.5%

Communication Services

-

6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.0%

Energy

-

3.6%

Financial Services

-

22.7%

Industrials

-

3.1%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Technology

-

39.4%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

MEDI
100.0%
EPEM
2.1%

Basic Materials

MEDI

-

EPEM
6.5%

Communication Services

MEDI

-

EPEM
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MEDI

-

EPEM
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

MEDI

-

EPEM
7.0%

Energy

MEDI

-

EPEM
3.6%

Financial Services

MEDI

-

EPEM
22.7%

Industrials

MEDI

-

EPEM
3.1%

Real Estate

MEDI

-

EPEM
1.3%

Technology

MEDI

-

EPEM
39.4%

Utilities

MEDI

-

EPEM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEDI vs. EPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEDI
MEDI Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MEDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEDI Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MEDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEDI Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

EPEM
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEDI vs. EPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) and Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEDIEPEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.59

MEDI vs. EPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEDIEPEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

2.96

-2.23

Drawdowns

MEDI vs. EPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEDI drawdown since its inception was -19.24%, which is greater than EPEM's maximum drawdown of -13.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDI and EPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEDIEPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.24%

-13.27%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.01%

-1.69%

-6.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-1.96%

-2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.10%

Volatility

MEDI vs. EPEM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEDIEPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.82%

19.37%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.63%

19.37%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.63%

19.37%

-0.74%

MEDI vs. EPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEDI has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than EPEM's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEDI vs. EPEM - Dividend Comparison

MEDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than EPEM's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
EPEM
Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.83%3.66%0.00%0.00%
MEDI
Harbor Health Care ETF
0.29%0.28%0.54%1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEDI and EPEM have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MEDI is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEDI is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for EPEM.

EPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 0.29% for MEDI.

MEDI is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while EPEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for MEDI and 0.84% for EPEM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEDI and EPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer