MEDI vs. CNCR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MEDI (Harbor Health Care ETF) and CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. MEDI is actively managed, while CNCR is passively managed. MEDI charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CNCR.

Performance

MEDI vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MEDI

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: -0.93%
• YTD: -4.02%
• 6M: -4.83%
• 1Y: 18.27%
• 3Y*: 12.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNCR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEDI vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MEDI Harbor Health Care ETF	-2.56%
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%

MEDI vs. CNCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MEDI	CNCR
Healthcare	100.0%	96.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	3.3%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MEDI vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEDI

MEDI Risk / Return Rank: 26
MEDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MEDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MEDI Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MEDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MEDI Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEDI vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MEDI	CNCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.59	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MEDI	CNCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	—	—

Drawdowns

MEDI vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEDI drawdown since its inception was -19.24%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDI and CNCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEDI	CNCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.24%	0.00%	-19.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.01%	0.00%	-8.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.28%	0.00%	-4.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.10%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MEDI	CNCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.02%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.42%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.82%	0.00%	+19.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.63%	0.00%	+18.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.63%	0.00%	+18.63%

MEDI vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEDI has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEDI vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison

MEDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MEDI Harbor Health Care ETF	0.29%	0.28%	0.54%	1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, MEDI or CNCR?

On fees, CNCR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEDI or CNCR?

CNCR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for MEDI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MEDI or CNCR?

MEDI has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.

What is the main difference between MEDI and CNCR?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for MEDI and 0.79% for CNCR.