MEDI vs. CNCR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

MEDI (Harbor Health Care ETF) and CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. MEDI is actively managed, while CNCR is passively managed. MEDI charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CNCR.

Performance

MEDI vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MEDI

• 1D: 2.55%
• 1M: 5.41%
• YTD: 3.97%
• 6M: 2.41%
• 1Y: 23.71%
• 3Y*: 15.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNCR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEDI vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MEDI Harbor Health Care ETF	8.13%
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%

MEDI vs. CNCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MEDI	CNCR
Healthcare	100.0%	96.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	3.3%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MEDI vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEDI

MEDI Risk / Return Rank: 35
MEDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MEDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
MEDI Omega Ratio Rank: 33
MEDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
MEDI Martin Ratio Rank: 33

CNCR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEDI vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MEDI	CNCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.53	—	—

Drawdowns

MEDI vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEDI drawdown since its inception was -19.24%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDI and CNCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEDI	CNCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.24%	0.00%	-19.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	0.00%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.29%	0.00%	-4.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.25%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MEDI	CNCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.78%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.75%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.26%	0.00%	+20.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.71%	0.00%	+18.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.71%	0.00%	+18.71%

MEDI vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEDI has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEDI vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison

MEDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MEDI Harbor Health Care ETF	0.27%	0.28%	0.54%	1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, MEDI or CNCR?

On fees, CNCR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEDI or CNCR?

CNCR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for MEDI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MEDI or CNCR?

MEDI has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.

What is the main difference between MEDI and CNCR?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for MEDI and 0.79% for CNCR.