PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MECIX vs. BINCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MECIX vs. BINCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG GW&K International Small Cap Fund (MECIX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MECIX having a 7.29% return and BINCX slightly higher at 7.56%. Over the past 10 years, MECIX has underperformed BINCX with an annualized return of 4.69%, while BINCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.87% annualized return.


MECIX

1D
2.23%
1M
0.58%
6M
3.95%
YTD
7.29%
1Y
8.32%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
1.07%
10Y*
4.69%
ALL TIME*
8.87%

BINCX

1D
1.47%
1M
7.58%
6M
3.07%
YTD
7.56%
1Y
13.42%
3Y*
27.56%
5Y*
18.21%
10Y*
10.87%
ALL TIME*
9.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MECIX vs. BINCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MECIX
AMG GW&K International Small Cap Fund
7.29%16.57%2.15%6.23%-20.34%2.33%1.72%9.90%-6.00%22.41%
BINCX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C
7.56%44.63%22.20%37.99%-9.36%18.22%3.79%6.06%-20.76%10.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MECIX and BINCX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.64

The correlation between MECIX and BINCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MECIX vs. BINCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MECIX
MECIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MECIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MECIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MECIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MECIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MECIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BINCX
BINCX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BINCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BINCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MECIX vs. BINCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K International Small Cap Fund (MECIX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MECIXBINCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.19

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

1.14

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.59

2.60

-0.01

MECIX vs. BINCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MECIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the BINCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MECIX and BINCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MECIX vs. BINCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MECIX drawdown since its inception was -68.42%, which is greater than BINCX's maximum drawdown of -48.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MECIX and BINCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MECIXBINCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.42%

-48.15%

-20.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-11.66%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.72%

-11.66%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.38%

-31.97%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.20%

-48.15%

-3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.85%

-1.24%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-9.38%

-4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

5.10%

-1.69%

Volatility

MECIX vs. BINCX - Volatility Comparison

AMG GW&K International Small Cap Fund (MECIX) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) at 3.42%. This indicates that MECIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MECIXBINCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

3.42%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.76%

10.80%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.99%

12.88%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

13.89%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.23%

14.10%

+5.13%

MECIX vs. BINCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MECIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than BINCX's 1.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

MECIX vs. BINCX - Dividend Comparison

MECIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BINCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BINCX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C
3.19%3.01%2.54%2.45%2.98%3.85%0.60%0.21%3.77%7.83%3.75%3.04%
MECIX
AMG GW&K International Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%2.06%1.51%1.34%0.68%0.00%0.02%9.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MECIX and BINCX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MECIX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to BINCX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MECIX dropped -68.42% vs BINCX's -48.15%.

BINCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MECIX and BINCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer