MDYV vs. OILK
MDYV (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MDYV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MDYV returned 7.57%/yr vs 17.28%/yr for OILK. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MDYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
MDYV vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDYV achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 61.09% return.
MDYV
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 21.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.57%
- 10Y*
- 10.31%
OILK
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 61.09%
- 6M
- 56.40%
- 1Y
- 56.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.39%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- —
MDYV vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF | 9.52% | 7.45% | 11.48% | 15.35% | -7.19% | 30.51% | 3.68% | 25.89% | -11.95% | 12.31% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 61.09% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDYV and OILK is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016 | 0.22 |
The correlation between MDYV and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MDYV vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDYV
OILK
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
MDYV
OILK
-
Industrials
MDYV
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
MDYV
OILK
Real Estate
MDYV
OILK
-
Technology
MDYV
OILK
-
Energy
MDYV
OILK
-
Basic Materials
MDYV
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
MDYV
OILK
-
Utilities
MDYV
OILK
-
Healthcare
MDYV
OILK
-
Communication Services
MDYV
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDYV vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
MDYV
OILK
MDYV vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDYV | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.33 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 3.30 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.17 | 6.67 | +0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDYV | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 1.99 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.58 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.11 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
MDYV vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDYV drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYV and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDYV | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.71% | -83.76% | +23.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -17.35% | +6.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.58% | -23.42% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.58% | -34.69% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.49% | +5.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.62% | -32.60% | +23.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 8.57% | -5.52% |
Volatility
MDYV vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) is 3.83%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.52%. This indicates that MDYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDYV | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 10.52% | -6.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 23.32% | -12.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.20% | 28.82% | -13.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 30.13% | -10.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 35.97% | -14.07% |
MDYV vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDYV vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
MDYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than OILK's 8.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF | 1.72% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.59% | 1.90% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.28% | 2.48% | 1.83% | 4.31% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.34% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDYV and OILK have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to MDYV (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYV dropped -60.71% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.28% vs 7.57% for MDYV. On fees, MDYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MDYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.28% return vs 7.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 1.72% for MDYV.
MDYV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYV and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDYV and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer