MDYG vs. PDP
MDYG (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF) and PDP (Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MDYG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while PDP is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDYG returned 11.58%/yr vs 13.59%/yr for PDP. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDYG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for PDP.
Performance
MDYG vs. PDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDYG achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly lower than PDP's 25.07% return. Over the past 10 years, MDYG has underperformed PDP with an annualized return of 11.58%, while PDP has yielded a comparatively higher 13.59% annualized return.
MDYG
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 6M
- 18.73%
- 1Y
- 30.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.58%
PDP
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 4.04%
- YTD
- 25.07%
- 6M
- 22.53%
- 1Y
- 37.22%
- 3Y*
- 24.59%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.59%
MDYG vs. PDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 19.44% | 7.22% | 15.84% | 17.30% | -18.92% | 18.46% | 22.57% | 26.10% | -10.46% | 19.61% |
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 25.07% | 8.37% | 26.06% | 20.88% | -24.49% | 7.72% | 36.59% | 33.13% | -5.96% | 23.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDYG and PDP is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2007 | 0.89 |
The correlation between MDYG and PDP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDYG vs. PDP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDYG
PDP
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MDYG
PDP
Technology
MDYG
PDP
Healthcare
MDYG
PDP
Consumer Cyclical
MDYG
PDP
Financial Services
MDYG
PDP
Real Estate
MDYG
PDP
Energy
MDYG
PDP
Basic Materials
MDYG
PDP
Consumer Defensive
MDYG
PDP
Utilities
MDYG
PDP
Communication Services
MDYG
PDP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDYG vs. PDP — Risk / Return Rank
MDYG
PDP
MDYG vs. PDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDYG | PDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.30 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.15 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.24 | 11.17 | +1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDYG | PDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 1.70 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.52 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.63 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.46 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
MDYG vs. PDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDYG drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, roughly equal to the maximum PDP drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYG and PDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDYG | PDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.44% | -59.34% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.91% | -11.87% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.45% | -23.79% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.26% | -33.91% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.27% | -34.70% | -4.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -10.60% | +2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 3.34% | -0.87% |
Volatility
MDYG vs. PDP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) is 5.08%, while Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that MDYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDYG | PDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 6.20% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.21% | 17.34% | -4.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.01% | 21.94% | -4.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 22.00% | -1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 21.58% | -0.53% |
MDYG vs. PDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PDP's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDYG vs. PDP - Dividend Comparison
MDYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than PDP's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.61% | 0.75% | 0.87% | 1.20% | 1.16% | 0.69% | 0.71% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 2.23% | 1.25% | 2.51% |
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.25% | 0.18% | 0.28% | 0.81% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDYG and PDP have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDP has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to MDYG (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYG dropped -58.44% vs PDP's -59.34%.
On 10-year performance, PDP leads with 13.59% vs 11.58% for MDYG. On fees, MDYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MDYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PDP has performed better with a 13.59% return vs 11.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PDP.
MDYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.11% for PDP.
MDYG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while PDP is Momentum. MDYG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while PDP tracks Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYG and 0.62% for PDP.
MDYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDYG and PDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer