PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDYG vs. BOUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDYG vs. BOUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDYG achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly lower than BOUT's 31.14% return.


MDYG

1D
0.27%
1M
4.57%
YTD
19.44%
6M
18.73%
1Y
30.20%
3Y*
18.49%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
11.58%

BOUT

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.96%
YTD
31.14%
6M
29.42%
1Y
34.29%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDYG vs. BOUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MDYG
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
19.44%7.22%15.84%17.30%-18.92%18.46%22.57%26.10%-18.85%
BOUT
Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF
31.14%-6.77%18.82%13.27%-22.60%22.69%50.56%20.59%-29.80%

Correlation

The correlation between MDYG and BOUT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2018

0.77

The correlation between MDYG and BOUT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDYG vs. BOUT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDYG
BOUT

Industrials

30.9%
9.7%

Technology

21.5%
28.4%

Healthcare

13.7%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
8.5%

Financial Services

7.1%
22.9%

Real Estate

5.6%
3.5%

Energy

3.7%
3.1%

Basic Materials

3.7%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
9.7%

Utilities

2.0%
7.0%

Communication Services

1.5%
2.0%

Industrials

MDYG
30.9%
BOUT
9.7%

Technology

MDYG
21.5%
BOUT
28.4%

Healthcare

MDYG
13.7%
BOUT
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MDYG
8.1%
BOUT
8.5%

Financial Services

MDYG
7.1%
BOUT
22.9%

Real Estate

MDYG
5.6%
BOUT
3.5%

Energy

MDYG
3.7%
BOUT
3.1%

Basic Materials

MDYG
3.7%
BOUT
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

MDYG
2.1%
BOUT
9.7%

Utilities

MDYG
2.0%
BOUT
7.0%

Communication Services

MDYG
1.5%
BOUT
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDYG vs. BOUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDYG
MDYG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MDYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BOUT
BOUT Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDYG vs. BOUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDYGBOUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.29

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.93

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.24

8.75

+3.49

MDYG vs. BOUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the BOUT Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDYG and BOUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDYGBOUTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

1.66

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.42

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.41

+0.07

Drawdowns

MDYG vs. BOUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDYG drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, which is greater than BOUT's maximum drawdown of -36.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYG and BOUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDYGBOUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.44%

-36.75%

-21.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.91%

-11.76%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.45%

-25.31%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.26%

-28.28%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.19%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-12.29%

+4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

3.93%

-1.46%

Volatility

MDYG vs. BOUT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) is 5.08%, while Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that MDYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDYGBOUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

5.46%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.21%

16.00%

-2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.01%

20.78%

-3.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.62%

19.48%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.05%

22.93%

-1.88%

MDYG vs. BOUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BOUT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDYG vs. BOUT - Dividend Comparison

MDYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than BOUT's 0.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOUT
Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF
0.26%0.34%0.60%1.32%1.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDYG
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
0.61%0.75%0.87%1.20%1.16%0.69%0.71%1.21%1.36%2.23%1.25%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDYG and BOUT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOUT has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to MDYG (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYG dropped -58.44% vs BOUT's -36.75%.

On 5-year performance, MDYG leads with 8.66% vs 8.21% for BOUT. On fees, MDYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MDYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MDYG has performed better with a 8.66% return vs 8.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MDYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BOUT.

MDYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.26% for BOUT.

MDYG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while BOUT tracks IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYG and 0.80% for BOUT.

MDYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDYG and BOUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer