PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDU vs. NI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MDU vs. NI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) and NiSource Inc. (NI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDU achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than NI's 11.24% return. Over the past 10 years, MDU has outperformed NI with an annualized return of 12.45%, while NI has yielded a comparatively lower 9.94% annualized return.


MDU

1D
1.88%
1M
-5.83%
YTD
9.08%
6M
10.20%
1Y
29.21%
3Y*
26.96%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
12.45%

NI

1D
0.70%
1M
-4.86%
YTD
11.24%
6M
10.89%
1Y
20.46%
3Y*
23.52%
5Y*
16.22%
10Y*
9.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDU vs. NI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDU
MDU Resources Group, Inc.
9.08%11.77%68.01%-1.94%1.46%20.37%-8.31%28.44%-8.64%-3.87%
NI
NiSource Inc.
11.24%16.81%43.48%0.48%2.67%24.75%-14.87%13.03%1.92%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MDU and NI is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1987

0.43

The correlation between MDU and NI shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MDU:

$4.38B

NI:

$22.05B

EPS

MDU:

$0.92

NI:

$2.02

PE Ratio

MDU:

23.00

NI:

22.66

PS Ratio

MDU:

2.41

NI:

3.19

PB Ratio

MDU:

1.51

NI:

2.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

MDU:

$1.81B

NI:

$6.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MDU:

$848.35M

NI:

$4.28B

EBITDA (TTM)

MDU:

$528.72M

NI:

$2.73B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDU vs. NI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDU
MDU Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
MDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDU Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
MDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDU Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

NI
NI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
NI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDU vs. NI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) and NiSource Inc. (NI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDUNIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.20

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.25

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.70

6.63

+0.07

MDU vs. NI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the NI Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDU and NI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDUNIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.16

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.81

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.43

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.48

-0.03

Drawdowns

MDU vs. NI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDU drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, smaller than the maximum NI drawdown of -65.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDU and NI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDUNIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.17%

-65.73%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.70%

-9.14%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.48%

-17.73%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.58%

-24.76%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.41%

-30.95%

-20.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.24%

-5.03%

-2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.33%

-12.92%

-1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

3.09%

+1.28%

Volatility

MDU vs. NI - Volatility Comparison

MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) and NiSource Inc. (NI) have volatilities of 5.64% and 5.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDUNIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

5.60%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.73%

12.05%

+2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.67%

17.77%

+3.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.07%

20.03%

+3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.11%

23.15%

+3.96%

Dividends

MDU vs. NI - Dividend Comparison

MDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than NI's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDU
MDU Resources Group, Inc.
2.60%2.77%1.89%3.16%2.88%2.77%3.17%2.74%3.33%2.88%2.62%4.01%
NI
NiSource Inc.
2.53%2.68%2.88%3.77%3.43%3.19%3.66%2.87%3.08%2.73%2.89%145.67%

Financials

MDU vs. NI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MDU Resources Group, Inc. and NiSource Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
606.00M
2.36B
(MDU) Total Revenue
(NI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MDU vs. NI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MDU Resources Group, Inc. and NiSource Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
81.1%
79.3%
Portfolio components
MDU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDU Resources Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 491.20M and revenue of 606.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.1%.

NI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NiSource Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.87B and revenue of 2.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.3%.

MDU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDU Resources Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 115.70M and revenue of 606.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.

NI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NiSource Inc. reported an operating income of 819.20M and revenue of 2.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.7%.

MDU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDU Resources Group, Inc. reported a net income of 80.80M and revenue of 606.00M, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.

NI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NiSource Inc. reported a net income of 507.10M and revenue of 2.36B, resulting in a net margin of 21.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MDU and NI have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDU has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to NI (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDU dropped -62.17% vs NI's -65.73%.

MDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDU and NI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer