MDU vs. SLB
MDU (MDU Resources Group, Inc.) and SLB (Schlumberger Limited) are both stocks. MDU operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials), while SLB operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 10 years, MDU returned 12.26%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for SLB. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MDU vs. SLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDU achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly lower than SLB's 49.78% return. Over the past 10 years, MDU has outperformed SLB with an annualized return of 12.26%, while SLB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.01% annualized return.
MDU
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -7.86%
- YTD
- 7.07%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 24.18%
- 3Y*
- 25.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
SLB
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 49.78%
- 6M
- 53.09%
- 1Y
- 72.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 0.01%
MDU vs. SLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDU MDU Resources Group, Inc. | 7.07% | 11.77% | 68.01% | -1.94% | 1.46% | 20.37% | -8.31% | 28.44% | -8.64% | -3.87% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 49.78% | 3.27% | -24.47% | -0.78% | 81.15% | 40.30% | -43.81% | 17.73% | -44.66% | -17.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDU and SLB is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1987 | 0.30 |
The correlation between MDU and SLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.32 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MDU:
$0.92
SLB:
$3.04
MDU:
22.57
SLB:
18.67
MDU:
2.37
SLB:
1.72
MDU:
$1.81B
SLB:
$35.94B
MDU:
$848.35M
SLB:
$4.90B
MDU:
$528.72M
SLB:
$5.30B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDU vs. SLB — Risk / Return Rank
MDU
SLB
MDU vs. SLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDU | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.35 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 5.11 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | 12.93 | -7.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDU | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 2.19 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.31 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.00 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.14 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
MDU vs. SLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDU drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, smaller than the maximum SLB drawdown of -87.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDU and SLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDU | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.17% | -87.64% | +25.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.70% | -14.30% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.48% | -46.63% | +25.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.58% | -46.63% | +23.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.41% | -84.29% | +32.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.95% | -32.73% | +23.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.33% | -31.18% | +16.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 5.64% | -1.17% |
Volatility
MDU vs. SLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) is 5.17%, while Schlumberger Limited (SLB) has a volatility of 8.52%. This indicates that MDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDU | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 8.52% | -3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 25.39% | -10.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.61% | 33.46% | -11.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.06% | 37.55% | -14.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.11% | 40.40% | -13.29% |
Dividends
MDU vs. SLB - Dividend Comparison
MDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than SLB's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDU MDU Resources Group, Inc. | 2.65% | 2.77% | 1.89% | 3.16% | 2.88% | 2.77% | 3.17% | 2.74% | 3.33% | 2.88% | 2.62% | 4.01% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 2.54% | 2.97% | 2.87% | 1.92% | 1.22% | 2.09% | 4.01% | 4.98% | 5.54% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.87% |
Financials
MDU vs. SLB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MDU Resources Group, Inc. and Schlumberger Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MDU vs. SLB - Profitability Comparison
MDU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDU Resources Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 491.20M and revenue of 606.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.1%.
SLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MDU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDU Resources Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 115.70M and revenue of 606.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.
SLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
MDU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDU Resources Group, Inc. reported a net income of 80.80M and revenue of 606.00M, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
SLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a net income of 752.00M and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MDU and SLB have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLB has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to MDU (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDU dropped -62.17% vs SLB's -87.64%.
SLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDU and SLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer