MDU vs. SLB
Compare and contrast key facts about MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MDU or SLB.
Correlation
The correlation between MDU and SLB is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MDU vs. SLB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MDU:
3.25
SLB:
-0.25
MDU:
4.18
SLB:
-0.17
MDU:
1.54
SLB:
0.98
MDU:
5.60
SLB:
-0.11
MDU:
17.17
SLB:
-0.38
MDU:
4.72%
SLB:
17.83%
MDU:
24.90%
SLB:
26.94%
MDU:
-61.78%
SLB:
-87.63%
MDU:
-8.05%
SLB:
-50.78%
Fundamentals
MDU:
$3.76B
SLB:
$61.54B
MDU:
$1.93
SLB:
$3.11
MDU:
9.54
SLB:
14.01
MDU:
1.68
SLB:
1.94
MDU:
$3.31B
SLB:
$27.02B
MDU:
$514.60M
SLB:
$5.43B
MDU:
$526.58M
SLB:
$6.13B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDU achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than SLB's 13.67% return. Over the past 10 years, MDU has outperformed SLB with an annualized return of 12.28%, while SLB has yielded a comparatively lower -3.30% annualized return.
MDU
2.16%
4.48%
29.13%
80.59%
15.19%
12.28%
SLB
13.67%
16.74%
-11.13%
-7.99%
4.88%
-3.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MDU vs. SLB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MDU
SLB
MDU vs. SLB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MDU vs. SLB - Dividend Comparison
MDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than SLB's 2.52% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDU MDU Resources Group, Inc. | 1.85% | 1.89% | 4.06% | 4.64% | 3.89% | 5.10% | 3.87% | 4.70% | 3.47% | 3.16% | 6.46% | 4.27% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 2.52% | 2.87% | 1.92% | 1.22% | 1.67% | 4.01% | 4.98% | 5.54% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.87% | 1.87% |
Drawdowns
MDU vs. SLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDU drawdown since its inception was -61.78%, smaller than the maximum SLB drawdown of -87.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDU and SLB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MDU vs. SLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) is 7.53%, while Schlumberger Limited (SLB) has a volatility of 9.19%. This indicates that MDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MDU vs. SLB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MDU Resources Group, Inc. and Schlumberger Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities