PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDU vs. RGP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MDU vs. RGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) and Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDU achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly higher than RGP's -14.40% return. Over the past 10 years, MDU has outperformed RGP with an annualized return of 12.46%, while RGP has yielded a comparatively lower -8.04% annualized return.


MDU

1D
1.84%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
12.09%
6M
11.92%
1Y
34.62%
3Y*
28.45%
5Y*
15.77%
10Y*
12.46%

RGP

1D
1.96%
1M
-7.95%
YTD
-14.40%
6M
-16.87%
1Y
-15.23%
3Y*
-32.34%
5Y*
-18.49%
10Y*
-8.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDU vs. RGP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDU
MDU Resources Group, Inc.
12.09%11.77%68.01%-1.94%1.46%20.37%-8.31%28.44%-8.64%-3.87%
RGP
Resources Connection, Inc.
-14.40%-37.28%-36.50%-20.09%6.25%47.30%-19.45%18.95%-5.11%-17.11%

Correlation

The correlation between MDU and RGP is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2006

0.38

The correlation between MDU and RGP shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MDU:

$4.47B

RGP:

$139.06M

EPS

MDU:

$0.92

RGP:

-$2.95

PS Ratio

MDU:

2.46

RGP:

0.29

PB Ratio

MDU:

1.54

RGP:

0.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

MDU:

$1.81B

RGP:

$485.23M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MDU:

$848.35M

RGP:

$185.73M

EBITDA (TTM)

MDU:

$528.72M

RGP:

-$12.52M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDU vs. RGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDU
MDU Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDU Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
MDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDU Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

RGP
RGP Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGP Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
RGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGP Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDU vs. RGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) and Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDURGPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.98

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

-0.38

+3.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.55

-0.65

+8.20

MDU vs. RGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the RGP Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDU and RGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDU vs. RGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDU drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, smaller than the maximum RGP drawdown of -83.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDU and RGP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDURGPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.17%

-83.07%

+20.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.70%

-39.75%

+30.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.48%

-75.92%

+54.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.69%

-81.12%

+58.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.41%

-81.12%

+29.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.68%

-79.30%

+74.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.32%

-46.93%

+32.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.60%

23.57%

-18.97%

Volatility

MDU vs. RGP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) is 5.78%, while Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) has a volatility of 14.40%. This indicates that MDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDURGPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

14.40%

-8.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

31.99%

-17.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.67%

46.29%

-24.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.00%

38.98%

-15.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.12%

37.74%

-10.62%

Dividends

MDU vs. RGP - Dividend Comparison

MDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than RGP's 6.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDU
MDU Resources Group, Inc.
2.59%2.77%1.89%3.16%2.88%2.77%3.17%2.74%3.33%2.88%2.62%4.01%
RGP
Resources Connection, Inc.
6.71%6.94%6.57%3.95%3.05%3.14%4.46%3.31%3.52%2.98%2.18%2.20%

Financials

MDU vs. RGP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MDU Resources Group, Inc. and Resources Connection, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
606.00M
107.93M
(MDU) Total Revenue
(RGP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MDU vs. RGP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MDU Resources Group, Inc. and Resources Connection, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
81.1%
35.7%
Portfolio components
MDU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDU Resources Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 491.20M and revenue of 606.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.1%.

RGP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported a gross profit of 38.58M and revenue of 107.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.7%.

MDU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDU Resources Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 115.70M and revenue of 606.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.

RGP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported an operating income of -8.35M and revenue of 107.93M, resulting in an operating margin of -7.7%.

MDU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDU Resources Group, Inc. reported a net income of 80.80M and revenue of 606.00M, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.

RGP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported a net income of -9.47M and revenue of 107.93M, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MDU and RGP have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGP has higher volatility (14.40%) compared to MDU (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDU dropped -62.17% vs RGP's -83.07%.

MDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDU and RGP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer