MDT vs. FBND

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MDT (Medtronic plc) is a stock, while FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, MDT returned 2.04%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for FBND. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MDT vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Medtronic plc (MDT) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDT achieves a -15.31% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 0.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MDT has underperformed FBND with an annualized return of 2.04%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively higher 2.47% annualized return.

MDT

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: 5.96%
• YTD: -15.31%
• 6M: -19.07%
• 1Y: -4.79%
• 3Y*: 2.04%
• 5Y*: -5.25%
• 10Y*: 2.04%

FBND

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -0.69%
• YTD: 0.10%
• 6M: 0.40%
• 1Y: 5.34%
• 3Y*: 4.60%
• 5Y*: 0.68%
• 10Y*: 2.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDT vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MDT Medtronic plc	-15.31%	24.05%	0.28%	9.58%	-22.55%	-9.79%	5.70%	27.34%	15.18%	15.90%
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	0.10%	7.57%	2.13%	6.81%	-12.54%	-0.43%	9.41%	9.82%	-0.57%	3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MDT and FBND is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014	0.10

The correlation between MDT and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MDT vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDT

MDT Risk / Return Rank: 31
MDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
MDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MDT Omega Ratio Rank: 27
MDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
MDT Martin Ratio Rank: 34

FBND

FBND Risk / Return Rank: 44
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDT vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medtronic plc (MDT) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MDT	FBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	1.41	-1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.20	2.09	-2.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.25	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	2.01	-2.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.43	5.97	-6.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MDT vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDT Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDT and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MDT	FBND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23	1.41	-1.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.24	0.12	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09	0.41	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.44	+0.03

Drawdowns

MDT vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDT drawdown since its inception was -57.63%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDT and FBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDT	FBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.63%	-17.25%	-40.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.90%	-2.66%	-26.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.90%	-5.94%	-22.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.10%	-17.25%	-27.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.10%	-17.25%	-27.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.81%	-1.82%	-28.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.54%	-3.35%	-13.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.17%	0.90%	+10.27%

Volatility

MDT vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

Medtronic plc (MDT) has a higher volatility of 10.04% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.23%. This indicates that MDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MDT	FBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.04%	1.23%	+8.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.19%	2.75%	+13.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.95%	3.80%	+17.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.93%	5.92%	+16.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.24%	6.10%	+17.14%

Dividends

MDT vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

MDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than FBND's 4.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	4.72%	4.70%	4.73%	4.26%	3.07%	1.86%	4.25%	2.90%	2.93%	2.56%	2.84%	3.26%
MDT Medtronic plc	3.52%	2.95%	3.49%	3.34%	3.44%	2.39%	1.95%	1.87%	2.15%	2.24%	2.34%	1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDT and FBND in my portfolio?

MDT and FBND have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MDT or FBND?

MDT has higher volatility (10.04%) compared to FBND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDT dropped -57.63% vs FBND's -17.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.