MDPL vs. RDIV
MDPL (Monarch Dividend Plus ETF) and RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - MDPL tracks the Monarch Dividend Plus Index while RDIV tracks the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MDPL returned 4.86% vs 29.23% for RDIV. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDPL charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RDIV.
Performance
MDPL vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDPL achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly lower than RDIV's 12.96% return.
MDPL
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 6M
- -0.85%
- 1Y
- 4.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDIV
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 11.70%
- 1Y
- 29.23%
- 3Y*
- 19.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
MDPL vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MDPL Monarch Dividend Plus ETF | -1.68% | 7.57% | 0.33% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 12.96% | 12.36% | 13.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDPL and RDIV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.78 |
The correlation between MDPL and RDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDPL vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank
MDPL
RDIV
MDPL vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Dividend Plus ETF (MDPL) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDPL | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.39 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 6.06 | -5.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.01 | 17.82 | -16.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDPL | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 2.22 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.55 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
MDPL vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDPL drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, smaller than the maximum RDIV drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDPL and RDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDPL | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.21% | -49.97% | +35.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.34% | -4.84% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.21% | -0.77% | -5.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.38% | -5.86% | +1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.83% | 1.64% | +3.19% |
Volatility
MDPL vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison
Monarch Dividend Plus ETF (MDPL) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) at 3.53%. This indicates that MDPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDPL | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 3.53% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 8.61% | +2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.27% | 13.21% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 17.53% | -2.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 21.88% | -6.73% |
MDPL vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDPL has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDPL vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison
MDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than RDIV's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDPL Monarch Dividend Plus ETF | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.63% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDPL and RDIV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDPL has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to RDIV (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDPL dropped -14.21% vs RDIV's -49.97%.
On 1-year performance, RDIV leads with 29.23% vs 4.86% for MDPL. On fees, RDIV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 29.23% return vs 4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDIV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for MDPL.
RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 1.31% for MDPL.
MDPL tracks Monarch Dividend Plus Index, while RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for MDPL and 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDPL and RDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer