PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDPL vs. RDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDPL vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Dividend Plus ETF (MDPL) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDPL achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly lower than RDIV's 12.96% return.


MDPL

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.11%
YTD
-1.68%
6M
-0.85%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RDIV

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.45%
YTD
12.96%
6M
11.70%
1Y
29.23%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
10.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDPL vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MDPL
Monarch Dividend Plus ETF
-1.68%7.57%0.33%
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
12.96%12.36%13.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MDPL and RDIV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024

0.78

The correlation between MDPL and RDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDPL vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDPL
MDPL Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDPL vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Dividend Plus ETF (MDPL) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDPLRDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.39

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

6.06

-5.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.01

17.82

-16.81

MDPL vs. RDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDPL Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the RDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDPL and RDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDPLRDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

2.22

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.55

-0.37

Drawdowns

MDPL vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDPL drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, smaller than the maximum RDIV drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDPL and RDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDPLRDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.21%

-49.97%

+35.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.34%

-4.84%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.21%

-0.77%

-5.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-5.86%

+1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.83%

1.64%

+3.19%

Volatility

MDPL vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison

Monarch Dividend Plus ETF (MDPL) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) at 3.53%. This indicates that MDPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDPLRDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

3.53%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.97%

8.61%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.27%

13.21%

+2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.15%

17.53%

-2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.15%

21.88%

-6.73%

MDPL vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDPL has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDPL vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison

MDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than RDIV's 3.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDPL
Monarch Dividend Plus ETF
1.31%1.42%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
3.63%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDPL and RDIV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDPL has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to RDIV (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDPL dropped -14.21% vs RDIV's -49.97%.

On 1-year performance, RDIV leads with 29.23% vs 4.86% for MDPL. On fees, RDIV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 29.23% return vs 4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDIV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for MDPL.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 1.31% for MDPL.

MDPL tracks Monarch Dividend Plus Index, while RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for MDPL and 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDPL and RDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer