MDLZ vs. JBBB
MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.) is a stock, while JBBB (Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF) is CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson. Over the past 3 years, MDLZ returned -1.98%/yr vs 10.46%/yr for JBBB. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MDLZ vs. JBBB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDLZ achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than JBBB's 2.03% return.
MDLZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- 1Y
- -2.75%
- 3Y*
- -1.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
JBBB
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 2.43%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDLZ vs. JBBB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 18.03% | -7.03% | -15.30% | 11.17% | 1.47% |
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | 2.03% | 5.43% | 12.50% | 17.63% | -5.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDLZ and JBBB is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2022 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDLZ vs. JBBB — Risk / Return Rank
MDLZ
JBBB
MDLZ vs. JBBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDLZ | JBBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.34 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 2.21 | -2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | 7.50 | -7.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDLZ vs. JBBB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDLZ drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, which is greater than JBBB's maximum drawdown of -10.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLZ and JBBB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDLZ | JBBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.52% | -10.57% | -31.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.93% | -2.46% | -23.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.00% | -3.82% | -25.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.59% | 0.00% | -12.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.03% | -1.57% | -9.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.70% | 0.72% | +13.98% |
Volatility
MDLZ vs. JBBB - Volatility Comparison
Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) at 1.02%. This indicates that MDLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JBBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDLZ | JBBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 1.02% | +4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.28% | 2.90% | +13.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.26% | 3.45% | +18.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.52% | 5.26% | +14.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 5.26% | +15.77% |
Dividends
MDLZ vs. JBBB - Dividend Comparison
MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than JBBB's 7.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | 7.11% | 8.41% | 9.24% | 8.71% | 5.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 3.13% | 3.60% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.62% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDLZ and JBBB have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDLZ has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to JBBB (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLZ dropped -42.52% vs JBBB's -10.57%.
JBBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDLZ and JBBB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer