PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDLZ vs. GDXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDLZ vs. GDXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDLZ achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than GDXY's -12.32% return.


MDLZ

1D
-0.58%
1M
3.31%
YTD
18.03%
6M
18.65%
1Y
-2.75%
3Y*
-1.98%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
6.09%

GDXY

1D
2.43%
1M
-14.26%
YTD
-12.32%
6M
-11.68%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDLZ vs. GDXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
18.03%-7.03%-13.22%
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
-12.32%88.08%-11.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MDLZ and GDXY is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2024

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDLZ vs. GDXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDLZ
MDLZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MDLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXY
GDXY Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GDXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXY Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXY Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDLZ vs. GDXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDLZGDXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.13

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

0.65

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.30

1.83

-2.13

MDLZ vs. GDXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDLZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the GDXY Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDLZ and GDXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDLZ vs. GDXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDLZ drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, which is greater than GDXY's maximum drawdown of -34.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLZ and GDXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDLZGDXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.52%

-34.16%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.93%

-34.16%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.59%

-29.61%

+17.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.03%

-6.72%

-4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.70%

12.05%

+2.65%

Volatility

MDLZ vs. GDXY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) is 5.46%, while YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) has a volatility of 14.51%. This indicates that MDLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDLZGDXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

14.51%

-9.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.28%

32.60%

-16.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.26%

38.00%

-15.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.52%

32.36%

-12.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

32.36%

-11.33%

Dividends

MDLZ vs. GDXY - Dividend Comparison

MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than GDXY's 82.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
82.04%52.13%23.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
3.13%3.60%3.00%2.24%2.21%2.01%2.05%1.98%2.40%1.92%1.62%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDLZ and GDXY have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXY has higher volatility (14.51%) compared to MDLZ (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLZ dropped -42.52% vs GDXY's -34.16%.

GDXY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDLZ and GDXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer