PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDLZ vs. 6AQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDLZ vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MDLZ is traded in USD, while 6AQQ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 6AQQ.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDLZ achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than 6AQQ.DE's 16.47% return. Over the past 10 years, MDLZ has underperformed 6AQQ.DE with an annualized return of 6.09%, while 6AQQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.74% annualized return.


MDLZ

1D
-0.58%
1M
4.22%
YTD
18.03%
6M
18.65%
1Y
-2.75%
3Y*
-1.98%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
6.09%

6AQQ.DE

1D
2.41%
1M
1.31%
YTD
16.47%
6M
17.95%
1Y
36.85%
3Y*
26.39%
5Y*
16.83%
10Y*
21.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDLZ vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
18.03%-7.03%-15.30%11.17%2.92%15.87%8.58%40.42%-4.27%-1.58%
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
16.47%20.88%26.12%56.33%-33.82%28.61%47.89%39.88%-1.62%32.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MDLZ and 6AQQ.DE is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2010

0.19

The correlation between MDLZ and 6AQQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDLZ vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDLZ
MDLZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MDLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDLZ vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDLZ6AQQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.37

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

3.29

-3.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.30

11.79

-12.10

MDLZ vs. 6AQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDLZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDLZ and 6AQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDLZ vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDLZ drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, which is greater than 6AQQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLZ and 6AQQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDLZ6AQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.52%

-35.00%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.93%

-10.84%

-15.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.00%

-23.05%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.14%

-35.00%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.74%

-35.00%

+5.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.59%

-3.14%

-9.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.03%

-5.16%

-5.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.70%

3.03%

+11.67%

Volatility

MDLZ vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) have volatilities of 5.46% and 5.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDLZ6AQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

5.74%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.28%

12.23%

+4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.26%

16.28%

+5.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.52%

20.72%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

19.97%

+1.06%

Dividends

MDLZ vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, while 6AQQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
3.13%3.60%3.00%2.24%2.21%2.01%2.05%1.98%2.40%1.92%1.62%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDLZ and 6AQQ.DE have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDLZ and 6AQQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer