PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDIZX vs. DCINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDIZX vs. DCINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International Diversification Fund R6 (MDIZX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDIZX achieves a 11.66% return, which is significantly lower than DCINX's 23.49% return.


MDIZX

1D
0.39%
1M
2.14%
6M
5.73%
YTD
11.66%
1Y
21.72%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.78%

DCINX

1D
0.54%
1M
0.75%
6M
12.94%
YTD
23.49%
1Y
42.43%
3Y*
27.17%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
12.27%
ALL TIME*
6.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MDIZX vs. DCINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDIZX
MFS International Diversification Fund R6
11.66%27.99%6.52%14.48%-17.04%7.79%15.45%26.09%-10.93%3.71%
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
23.49%46.37%7.65%15.98%-14.67%9.70%19.86%18.14%-14.27%2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between MDIZX and DCINX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017

0.89

The correlation between MDIZX and DCINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDIZX vs. DCINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MDIZX
MDIZX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MDIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DCINX
DCINX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DCINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DCINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MDIZX vs. DCINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Diversification Fund R6 (MDIZX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDIZXDCINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.44

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

3.77

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.72

13.71

-5.99

MDIZX vs. DCINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDIZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the DCINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDIZX and DCINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDIZX vs. DCINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDIZX drawdown since its inception was -30.09%, smaller than the maximum DCINX drawdown of -61.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIZX and DCINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDIZXDCINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.09%

-61.79%

+31.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-11.91%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.59%

-13.74%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.09%

-31.18%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.85%

+2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.60%

-12.77%

+6.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.27%

-0.24%

Volatility

MDIZX vs. DCINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS International Diversification Fund R6 (MDIZX) is 4.03%, while Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that MDIZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDIZXDCINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

5.46%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.62%

15.87%

-4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.53%

18.05%

-4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.42%

15.84%

-1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.21%

16.53%

-1.32%

MDIZX vs. DCINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDIZX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than DCINX's 2.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDIZX vs. DCINX - Dividend Comparison

MDIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than DCINX's 8.86% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
8.86%10.95%13.87%3.45%3.53%15.49%1.36%1.54%6.92%3.92%
MDIZX
MFS International Diversification Fund R6
4.71%5.26%3.61%4.24%2.76%2.79%1.72%2.57%3.23%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDIZX and DCINX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCINX has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to MDIZX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDIZX dropped -30.09% vs DCINX's -61.79%.

DCINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDIZX and DCINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer