PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDIZX vs. FTIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDIZX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International Diversification Fund R6 (MDIZX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDIZX achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly lower than FTIHX's 14.72% return.


MDIZX

1D
0.03%
1M
3.47%
YTD
9.61%
6M
11.89%
1Y
21.66%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
7.07%
10Y*

FTIHX

1D
0.40%
1M
4.63%
YTD
14.72%
6M
17.88%
1Y
31.88%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDIZX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDIZX
MFS International Diversification Fund R6
9.61%27.99%6.52%14.48%-17.04%7.79%15.45%26.09%-10.93%3.71%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
14.72%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%11.09%21.50%-14.40%1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MDIZX and FTIHX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017

0.96

The correlation between MDIZX and FTIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDIZX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDIZX
MDIZX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MDIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDIZX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Diversification Fund R6 (MDIZX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDIZXFTIHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

2.33

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.61

3.16

-0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.93

-0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.62

11.58

-3.96

MDIZX vs. FTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDIZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDIZX and FTIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDIZXFTIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.33

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.56

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.63

-0.05

Drawdowns

MDIZX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDIZX drawdown since its inception was -30.09%, smaller than the maximum FTIHX drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIZX and FTIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDIZXFTIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.09%

-35.75%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-11.25%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.59%

-13.15%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.09%

-29.99%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.70%

-7.22%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.85%

+0.15%

Volatility

MDIZX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS International Diversification Fund R6 (MDIZX) is 3.99%, while Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that MDIZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDIZXFTIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

4.76%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

12.01%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

14.31%

-1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

15.27%

-1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.20%

16.05%

-0.85%

MDIZX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDIZX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDIZX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison

MDIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, more than FTIHX's 2.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.43%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%
MDIZX
MFS International Diversification Fund R6
4.80%5.26%3.61%4.24%2.76%2.79%1.72%2.57%3.23%1.66%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, MDIZX and FTIHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTIHX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to MDIZX (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDIZX dropped -30.09% vs FTIHX's -35.75%.

FTIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDIZX and FTIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer