MDIV vs. MDAA
MDIV (First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund) and MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. MDIV is passively managed, while MDAA is actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MDIV charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MDAA.
Performance
MDIV vs. MDAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDIV achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than MDAA's 22.13% return.
MDIV
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 11.03%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
MDAA
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 8.24%
- YTD
- 22.13%
- 6M
- 22.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDIV vs. MDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MDIV First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund | 7.68% | -0.41% |
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 22.13% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDIV and MDAA is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDIV vs. MDAA — Risk / Return Rank
MDIV
MDAA
MDIV vs. MDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDIV | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDIV | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 1.47 | -1.12 |
Drawdowns
MDIV vs. MDAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDIV drawdown since its inception was -48.50%, which is greater than MDAA's maximum drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIV and MDAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDIV | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.50% | -14.59% | -33.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -1.11% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.58% | -2.93% | -1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | — | — |
Volatility
MDIV vs. MDAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDIV | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.71% | 23.89% | -17.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.93% | 23.89% | -12.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 23.89% | -8.66% |
MDIV vs. MDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDIV has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than MDAA's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDIV vs. MDAA - Dividend Comparison
MDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, more than MDAA's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDIV First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund | 6.39% | 6.51% | 6.40% | 6.08% | 6.71% | 5.30% | 6.00% | 5.90% | 6.76% | 6.04% | 6.35% | 7.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDIV and MDAA have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MDIV is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MDIV is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MDAA.
MDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.39%, compared with 0.38% for MDAA.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Myriad. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for MDIV and 0.97% for MDAA.
Find the right allocation for MDIV and MDAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer