MDIV vs. BAMY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MDIV (First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund) and BAMY (Brookstone Yield ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. MDIV is passively managed, while BAMY is actively managed. Over the past year, MDIV returned 11.03% vs 10.68% for BAMY. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDIV charges 0.73%/yr vs 1.48%/yr for BAMY.

Performance

MDIV vs. BAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDIV achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly higher than BAMY's 1.16% return.

MDIV

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 7.68%
• 6M: 7.38%
• 1Y: 11.03%
• 3Y*: 11.41%
• 5Y*: 5.65%
• 10Y*: 4.66%

BAMY

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 1.16%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 10.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDIV vs. BAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MDIV First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund	7.68%	3.77%	10.05%	8.48%
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	1.16%	12.93%	10.60%	5.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MDIV and BAMY is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023	0.50

The correlation between MDIV and BAMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDIV vs. BAMY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MDIV	BAMY
Financial Services	22.4%	6.8%
Real Estate	21.6%	1.3%
Energy	17.6%	1.5%
Utilities	9.6%	2.5%
Consumer Defensive	8.0%	5.3%
Communication Services	3.2%	13.0%
Consumer Cyclical	3.2%	12.6%
Healthcare	1.6%	8.7%
Industrials	1.6%	6.6%
Basic Materials	0.7%	1.5%
Technology	-	40.4%

Return for Risk

MDIV vs. BAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDIV

MDIV Risk / Return Rank: 52
MDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
MDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
MDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 45
MDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

BAMY

BAMY Risk / Return Rank: 79
BAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
BAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
BAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
BAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDIV vs. BAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MDIV	BAMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	2.33	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	3.39	-0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.49	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	4.32	-1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.10	19.33	-10.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MDIV vs. BAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the BAMY Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDIV and BAMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MDIV	BAMY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	2.33	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	1.87	-1.53

Drawdowns

MDIV vs. BAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDIV drawdown since its inception was -48.50%, which is greater than BAMY's maximum drawdown of -6.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIV and BAMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDIV	BAMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.50%	-6.03%	-42.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.39%	-2.48%	-0.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-0.24%	-0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.58%	-0.53%	-4.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	0.55%	+0.67%

Volatility

MDIV vs. BAMY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) has a higher volatility of 1.62% compared to Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) at 1.09%. This indicates that MDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MDIV	BAMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.62%	1.09%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.32%	2.80%	+1.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.71%	4.62%	+2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.93%	6.03%	+4.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.23%	6.03%	+9.20%

MDIV vs. BAMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDIV has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMY's 1.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDIV vs. BAMY - Dividend Comparison

MDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, less than BAMY's 7.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	7.59%	7.16%	8.20%	1.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MDIV First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund	6.39%	6.51%	6.40%	6.08%	6.71%	5.30%	6.00%	5.90%	6.76%	6.04%	6.35%	7.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDIV and BAMY in my portfolio?

MDIV and BAMY have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MDIV or BAMY?

MDIV has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to BAMY (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDIV dropped -48.50% vs BAMY's -6.03%.

Which ETF is better, MDIV or BAMY?

On 1-year performance, MDIV leads with 11.03% vs 10.68% for BAMY. On fees, MDIV is cheaper at 0.73% per year. On volatility, BAMY has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MDIV or BAMY?

Over the 1-year period, MDIV has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 10.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MDIV or BAMY?

MDIV is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 1.48% for BAMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MDIV or BAMY?

BAMY has the higher dividend yield at 7.59%, compared with 6.39% for MDIV.

What is the main difference between MDIV and BAMY?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for MDIV and 1.48% for BAMY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.