PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDISX vs. VTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDISX vs. VTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) and Ventas, Inc. (VTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDISX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than VTR's 2.80% return. Over the past 10 years, MDISX has outperformed VTR with an annualized return of 8.58%, while VTR has yielded a comparatively lower 5.93% annualized return.


MDISX

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.37%
YTD
1.50%
6M
3.70%
1Y
13.36%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
8.58%

VTR

1D
-1.36%
1M
-9.97%
YTD
2.80%
6M
0.04%
1Y
28.40%
3Y*
24.36%
5Y*
10.53%
10Y*
5.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDISX vs. VTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDISX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund
1.50%23.75%6.38%20.48%-4.73%19.60%-4.38%24.74%-10.86%7.22%
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
2.80%35.09%22.24%15.06%-8.53%7.73%-9.80%3.42%3.45%0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MDISX and VTR is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 1998

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between MDISX and VTR has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDISX vs. VTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDISX
MDISX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MDISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDISX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MDISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDISX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

VTR
VTR Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDISX vs. VTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) and Ventas, Inc. (VTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDISXVTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.30

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

2.28

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.23

9.70

-5.48

MDISX vs. VTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the VTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDISX and VTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDISXVTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.55

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.43

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.17

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.30

+0.51

Drawdowns

MDISX vs. VTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDISX drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, smaller than the maximum VTR drawdown of -83.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDISX and VTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDISXVTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.15%

-83.38%

+43.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

-12.52%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.93%

-19.35%

+6.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.57%

-41.80%

+20.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.15%

-76.92%

+36.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.23%

-12.52%

+8.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-18.20%

+12.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

2.93%

+0.32%

Volatility

MDISX vs. VTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) is 3.23%, while Ventas, Inc. (VTR) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that MDISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDISXVTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

6.27%

-3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

13.86%

-4.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.85%

18.47%

-6.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.67%

24.87%

-9.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

34.73%

-17.62%

Dividends

MDISX vs. VTR - Dividend Comparison

MDISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%, more than VTR's 2.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDISX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund
10.40%10.55%12.84%7.12%10.29%8.75%3.50%7.21%7.50%2.97%4.13%7.77%
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
2.48%2.48%3.06%3.61%4.00%3.52%4.37%5.49%5.40%5.19%4.74%20.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDISX and VTR have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTR has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to MDISX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDISX dropped -40.15% vs VTR's -83.38%.

VTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDISX and VTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer