PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDISX vs. GLIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDISX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDISX achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than GLIFX's 9.48% return. Over the past 10 years, MDISX has underperformed GLIFX with an annualized return of 8.91%, while GLIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.83% annualized return.


MDISX

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.07%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.44%
1Y
10.88%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
8.91%

GLIFX

1D
0.57%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
9.48%
6M
9.78%
1Y
18.04%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*
10.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDISX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDISX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund
0.72%23.75%6.38%20.48%-4.73%19.60%-4.38%24.74%-10.86%7.22%
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
9.48%23.85%6.71%10.89%-1.33%19.91%-4.51%22.27%-3.82%20.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MDISX and GLIFX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between MDISX and GLIFX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDISX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDISX
MDISX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MDISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDISX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MDISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDISX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

GLIFX
GLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDISX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDISXGLIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.30

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

1.95

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.10

6.07

-2.97

MDISX vs. GLIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDISX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the GLIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDISX and GLIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDISX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDISX drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, which is greater than GLIFX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDISX and GLIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDISXGLIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.15%

-29.65%

-10.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

-9.00%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.93%

-10.02%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.57%

-17.15%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.15%

-29.65%

-10.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.97%

-3.90%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-3.36%

-1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

2.88%

+0.56%

Volatility

MDISX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) at 2.60%. This indicates that MDISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDISXGLIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

2.60%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

9.38%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.03%

10.77%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.68%

11.00%

+4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

13.22%

+3.82%

MDISX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDISX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDISX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison

MDISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.48%, more than GLIFX's 7.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
7.17%6.22%4.26%2.95%14.81%6.21%2.59%4.44%14.29%6.94%1.91%11.33%
MDISX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund
10.48%10.55%12.84%7.12%10.29%8.75%3.50%7.21%7.50%2.97%4.13%7.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDISX and GLIFX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDISX has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to GLIFX (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDISX dropped -40.15% vs GLIFX's -29.65%.

GLIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDISX and GLIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer