MDIJX vs. PCGG

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MDIJX (MFS International Diversification Fund) and PCGG (Polen Capital Global Growth ETF) are both funds - MDIJX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by MFS, while PCGG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Polen. Over the past year, MDIJX returned 22.72% vs -5.25% for PCGG. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MDIJX charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for PCGG.

Performance

MDIJX vs. PCGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) and Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDIJX achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly higher than PCGG's -5.73% return.

MDIJX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 1.71%
• 6M: 5.54%
• YTD: 11.17%
• 1Y: 22.72%
• 3Y*: 15.38%
• 5Y*: 7.65%
• 10Y*: 9.78%
• ALL TIME*: 8.28%

PCGG

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: 2.39%
• 6M: -2.39%
• YTD: -5.73%
• 1Y: -5.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MDIJX MFS International Diversification Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF	$21.56K	$40.61K	$39.96K

MDIJX vs. PCGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MDIJX MFS International Diversification Fund	11.17%	27.84%	6.41%	3.85%
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF	-5.73%	1.62%	12.40%	4.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MDIJX and PCGG is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2023	0.62

The correlation between MDIJX and PCGG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MDIJX vs. PCGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MDIJX

MDIJX Risk / Return Rank: 57
MDIJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
MDIJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
MDIJX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
MDIJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
MDIJX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

PCGG

PCGG Risk / Return Rank: 7
PCGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
PCGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PCGG Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PCGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PCGG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MDIJX vs. PCGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) and Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MDIJX	PCGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	-0.32	+1.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	-0.34	+2.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	0.96	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	-0.23	+2.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.26	-0.50	+7.76

MDIJX vs. PCGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDIJX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the PCGG Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDIJX and PCGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MDIJX vs. PCGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDIJX drawdown since its inception was -56.60%, which is greater than PCGG's maximum drawdown of -22.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIJX and PCGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDIJX	PCGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.60%	-22.66%	-33.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.40%	-22.66%	+11.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-10.44%	+10.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.04%	-5.40%	-3.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	10.57%	-7.53%

Volatility

MDIJX vs. PCGG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) is 4.10%, while Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that MDIJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MDIJX	PCGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	4.62%	-0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.70%	13.45%	-1.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.57%	16.30%	-2.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.42%	16.75%	-2.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.54%	16.75%	-2.21%

MDIJX vs. PCGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDIJX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGG's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDIJX vs. PCGG - Dividend Comparison

MDIJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, while PCGG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MDIJX MFS International Diversification Fund	4.65%	5.17%	3.50%	4.14%	2.64%	2.70%	1.64%	2.50%	3.14%	1.63%	2.18%	1.69%
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDIJX and PCGG in my portfolio?

MDIJX and PCGG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MDIJX or PCGG?

PCGG has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to MDIJX (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDIJX dropped -56.60% vs PCGG's -22.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MDIJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.